Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-12-10/In the news

"the charges have been dropped" is an inaccurate description, as it is apparently not legally possible to withdraw this kind of criminal complaint, and there hasn't been a statement from the prosecutor yet. See my remarks at User talk:Michael Snow/German Wikipedia. And to imply a causal connection to "some of the symbols are being removed" is a bit too much Schubert's POV - instead, many people attributed her withdrawal to the stiff opposition that she had to face, including from several members of her own party, and to the legal futility of the complaint. Regards, High on a tree (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why is there no mention that Polish Wikipedia was sued that week too.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I only know about things if people report them to the tip line, Google News picks it up, or I happen to stumble across it one day. enochlau (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right... see my link above to my report in the tip line. I just wonder if I should use it again, or is it forgotten? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 03:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must've missed it. Sorry about that. enochlau (talk) 04:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I was wondering if I didn't provide enough info or if it wasn't interesting enough. Do you think we can mention this in a future edition? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll mention it briefly in the December 17 edition that I'm writing now. enochlau (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]