so all I did was a quick mechanical polish on other editors's hard work. 11:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
The important thing is that you are doing substantive work on actual content. Good on you! 10:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
...I have built it into a dash-fixing script I use a lot: User:BrownHairedGirl/biogdashes.js, which I forked years ago from a script developed
"You may find that helpful". (A comment BHG makes often to visitors to her page)
You're amazing yourself, BHG, in the sheer amount of work you do on categories etc! .....add thorough categories to stubs.... your .js looks useful but a bit intimidating...PamD 11:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
I encountered that page as part of an exercise I have been doing of cleaning up women-politicians-by-century categories. I realised that I could reduce some of the clutter by intersecting Category:Women Teachtaí Dála with the by-century centuries...It's not complete yet, but I am most of the way there. And along the way I have encountered a few articles which needed other categorisation tweaks, such as María Izquierdo Rojo. BrownHairedGirl 10:41, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
your assistance with reparenting Categories Fayenatic London 21:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
there are several different ways of viewing this, and I chose what I thought was the least controversial BHG
So I have rejigged the template --BrownHairedGirl 21:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
"And I think Iridescent nails it in that first paragraph. ("I can entirely see why she feels she's now not welcome; the Arbitration Committee have taken what appear to be demonstrable falsehoods about her and given them the formal status of "findings of facts"). Black Kite (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
This award is intended to boost the spirits of the editor that receives it. To thank her for years of effort.―Buster7☎ 15:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]