Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil/Education and Science in Brazil task force

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBrazil: Education and science Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by the Education and Science in Brazil task force.

Universities names in English[edit]

According to WP:UE:

In deciding whether and how to translate a foreign name into English, follow English-language usage. If there is no established English-language treatment for a name, translate it if this can be done without loss of accuracy and with greater understanding for the English-speaking reader.

Therefore, I'd like to propose renaming all members of Category:Universities and colleges in Brazil that are not currently in English. Your thoughts? Thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 00:21, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anything that helps improve consistency is a big plus in my opinion. No objections here… Go for it! giso6150 (talk) 00:30, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, well -- easily said than done: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Brazil/Education and Science in Brazil task force/Listing in English. At least most names in English already exist as redirects. Some translations need improvement. Please weigh in. Thanks! Fgnievinski (talk) 04:15, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot thank you all enough for taking on this project. Is there a MOS that could nudge the Brazil-related articles towards English names in general? Prburley (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: I guess it's just a matter of resolving the few question marks in the list, then proceed to request technical moves, given the agreement demonstrated here. Maybe we can use Google Scholar to settle usage, e.g., 105 vs. 154 hits. fgnievinski (talk) 06:14, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fgnievinski: English-language usage in affiliations in scholarly papers is less than ideal (would prefer a publication of the body itself) but they're utterly consistent across authors and publications. Prburley (talk) 15:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: We can also try site-specific google searches, e.g., site:univasf.edu.br "Federal University". This would only be necessary for the handful of quotation marks in the Listing in English. fgnievinski (talk) 16:14, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Fgnievinski: Tried it before with odd yet successful results. One English-language name was buried in the university page HTML code but not displayed anywhere in the website. I enjoy doing the research on these things but I refuse to do moves and such because of the inevitable meanness that'll come from an old-school editor or senior admin. Prburley (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: No problem, I can do the moves (or request technical moves, in case a redirect already exists). fgnievinski (talk) 17:19, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Finalizing this project[edit]

Can I suggest adding a icon next to the final decisions for each "proposed" name, or a third column with "final decision"? I think it's close to finished but I can't see what's left.

Will do it, thanks for sourcing a lot of the names. fgnievinski (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: Done! fgnievinski (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: Did you have a chance to investigate the last few pending names? Thanks. fgnievinski (talk) 13:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Prburley: I've completed most of the uncontroversial moves for federal universities. fgnievinski (talk) 21:47, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Fgnievinski: Awesome. Sorry I've been away from WP, much going on at work!!! Prburley (talk) 17:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes[edit]

I noticed that Template:Infobox university has fields native_name and native_name_lang; I think we can start using them before we rename pages. Acronyms are common, so they can go in the Other_names field, e.g.: |name = Federal University of ABC |native_name = Universidade Federal do ABC |native_name_lang = Pt |other_names = UFABC. fgnievinski (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Initially let's change only the infobox and leave the lead text to be changed when the page is moved, shall we. Then the standard boiler plate would read, e.g.: The '''Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte''' ({{lang-pt|'''Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte'''}}, '''UFRN''').... fgnievinski (talk) 15:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that many Brazilian universities don't have an infobox, but do have a logo or photo; let's create a bare-bones infobox when necessary, e.g., {{Infobox university |name = Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte |native_name = Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte |native_name_lang = Pt |other_names = UFRN |image=Reitoria-UFRN.jpg}}. fgnievinski (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article British School of Brasília has been PRODed and will most likely be deleted after April 1st, 2016 unless it is improved. Since the school hasn’t opened yet, it may be more appropriate to merge the information about the school into the article British Schools Foundation. If salvaged, a more appropriate title would be British School of Brasília, but I am not moving it now, since I haven’t located any reasonable sources to support keeping it. giso6150 (talk) 15:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the page to a more appropriate title, but am not convinced that it should remain as a standalone article. giso6150 (talk) 18:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool[edit]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]