Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/16 March 2012/Occupy Wall Street

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


FAQ[edit]

Guys, is it okay if we use the talk page for non-substantive questions about the mediation process? I've read the page at WP:M but I looked through a couple messy past mediation cases, and they violate the stated rules. I've never been in a mediation case but already it looks like the issue is being favorably framed in Becritical's favor with the wording How to provide due weight within the article to show neutral point of view will providing an informative and well-sourced section because I don't agree. To me, it's about how to handle this issue instead (which was omitted from the past discussions page until I added it) because I've read every past discussion and I strongly believe the issue is escalating the issue as a means of gaming the system to sidestep consensus which failed already 4 times. I don't want to waste space on the project page talking about these questions I have, so can someone please shed some light on my first impressions of this crusade we're about to enter into? 완젬스 (talk) 06:58, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We could discuss those issues as well. Feel free to add it to that section on the mediation project page, if you haven't done so already. As I explained before, the Mediation Cabal is much more lightweight and informal than the Mediation Committee. The mediation policy provides suggestions on how to go about mediation. Should you have any concerns please contact me. Also, to ensure that everything stays organized and structured, I may "archive" discussions from the project mediation page and bring it over here to the talk page. Regards, Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 01:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mediaite[edit]

Extended content
Mediaite
Type of site
Blog
Created byDan Abrams (Publisher)
Colby Hall (Managing Editor)
Jon Nicosia (Senior Editor and Video Director)
Tommy Christopher (Political Editor and White House Correspondent)
Nando DiFino (Editor)
Alex Alvarez (Editor)
Frances Martel (Contributing Editor)
Jon Bershad (Contributing Editor)
URLhttp://www.mediaite.com/
LaunchedJuly 6, 2009
Current statusActive

Mediaite is a right wing news and opinion blog covering politics and entertainment in the media industry as well as other issues. It is the flagship blog of Abrams Media, a ring of blogs run by ABC legal analyst Dan Abrams and also featuring Gossip Cop, Geekosystem, Styleite, Sports Grid, The Mary Sue and Mogulite. Described by Abrams as "for the media, about the media and part of the new media,"[1] it features regular columns, an extensive video library, and the "Power Grid" that ranks media personalities by influence.

Abrams launched the site in July 2009 and currently serves as the site's publisher. The site's managing editor is Colby Hall. Other editors include Tommy Christopher, Nando DiFino, Alex Alvarez, Matt Schneider, Frances Martel and Jon Bershad. In an interview with The Washington Post, Hall described the site as "Huffington Post meets Gawker."[2]

Traffic

After four months in operation, an analysis by media ratings blog TV By the Numbers indicated that Mediaite's traffic was comparable to that of similar blogs such as The Wrap and Deadline Hollywood Daily.[3] As of March 2010, Mediaite's traffic averaged about a million visitors a month, more than the entire Mediabistro.com blog network combined.[4] Mediaite is currently ranked in Technorati's top 100 blogs at #19.[5] In January 2011, Mediaite surpassed 9 million unique visitors. [6]

As of April 2011, Mediaite attracts an average of 1.2 million unique visitors per month. [7]

Power Grid

One notable feature of the site is the Power Grid,[8] a daily-updating list that uses an algorithm to rank over 1500 media professionals. The Power Grid uses a host of metrics,[9] such as TV viewership and Twitter followers, to determine individuals' ranks in their respective categories. Mediaite has stated that the list will continue to "roll out new metrics, new categories of people to be ranked, and new features for the Power Grid."[10] The Power Grid model has also been adapted to the other Abrams Media blogs Geekosystem, Styleite, and Sports Grid.


References

  1. ^ "A Note From Dan Abrams". Mediaite. 2009-07-05. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
  2. ^ "Media Notes: Howard Kurtz on the Personality Preoccupation of Mediaite.com". The Washington Post. 2009-07-06. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
  3. ^ . TV by the Numbers http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/05/nikki-finke-vs-the-wrap-vs-mediaite/32761. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  4. ^ "Mediaite.com Quantcast Audience Profile". Quantcast. 2010-03-23.
  5. ^ "Top 100 Blogs - 1 to 25". Technorati. 2011-04-08. Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  6. ^ http://www.mediaite.com/online/abrams-media-network-passes-9-million-unique-visitors-for-month-of-january/
  7. ^ http://www.quantcast.com/mediaite.com
  8. ^ "The Real Reason You Should Hate The Media (And That Includes Us) - Emeritus". Deadspin. 2009-07-07. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
  9. ^ "Power Grid FAQ". Mediaite. Retrieved 2010-04-02.
  10. ^ "I Was a Teenage Power Grid". Mediaite. 2009-07-08. Retrieved 2010-04-02.

External links

I'll be releasing a statement later today[edit]

I am afraid of spreading myself too thin. I have taken on a couple extra articles and I'm afraid my efficacy will suffer over there if I devote the needed amount of time here. It takes a lot of time, influence, and focus to bring about desired outcomes, which clearly BeCritical and SomeDifferentStuff both have, so I'll keep this page on my watchlist. I wish the best of luck to you both. Regards, 완젬스 (talk) 08:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to see that you have to depart at such an early stage in the mediation. We hope that you can return and provide your thoughts. Regards, Whenaxis talk · contribs | DR goes to Wikimania! 23:12, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]