Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Bollywood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Addressed comments moved from nomination page
  • I'm seeing a lot of whitespace in the Featured content box
Done
Done
Thanks for the early comments. — Bill william comptonTalk 15:11, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
  • Portal:Bollywood/Selected picture/6 - Who are they? Also, I'm not quite comfortable with the image. It was uploaded without any EXIF data, at web resolution, by an editor with few contributions, so it may be a copyvio.
Done
  • Not as good as the others. Do you have another image?
Replaced with the Aamir Khan's.
Done
Done
Done
  • Ranveer Singh hook - drop the comma
Done
Done
  • That's a lot of actresses. Any more guys?
Done
  • These people are mostly still active. Any more historical actors or actresses?
Unfortunately not possible. No such FAs or GAs exist :(
  • Standardise dates: DMY or MDY?
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
  • Her portrayal of a sex worker in Chameli (2004) proved to be the turning point in her career. - How?
The para is supposed to be a summary of whole article, and a complete paragraph within the article is dedicated to this.
Done
  • Article: FN12 (Chatterjee, Gulzar & Nihalani 2003) does not go anywhere
Fixed
Done, but check it please.
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Yeah, I did.
  • Perhaps replace it with the one that isn't nominated for deletion? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:28, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replaced, although bot will replace it globally.
  • Seems a bit lengthy.
Lengthy? but it's less that 200 words. Or you are talking about image?
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Replaced
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
  • Blurb should be chronological, more logical.
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
  • Before his breakthrough role as a romantic actor in 2000, he was married to Sarita Birje and has a young son. - Is he still married to her? What's with the past tense?
Corrected, just copied it from the article.
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Done
  • Ananthabhadram - Check the spelling, the article is at a different title
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Replaced, and posted a request to remove the watermark.
  • I copyedited, be sure to check.
Done
  • Still not particularly good. Perhaps another image? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:33, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
  • All images: Remember, captions which are not full sentences should not have a period at the end. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:51, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
DYK
  • File:Amithab bachan.jpg - Not sure on whether this is free or not. No EXIF data, web resolution. His article has another image you could use.
Done
Which one? — Bill william comptonTalk 12:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on the template under the PD-India one, it looks like this may have fallen afoul of the URAA... which sucks, honestly. Might have to look for another lead hook. File:Nargis in Awaara film.jpg falls under the same issues. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:31, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
Selected biographies
  • Lot of the prose seems listy... might have some grief about that.
  • That's it for SB — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Featured content - Suggest retitling "recognised content", as most are GAs. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:14, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
  • Crisco, since the subject is new to me as well, I may take a little more time to fulfil the requirements. Also, would you please strike out the resolved comments because it's getting difficult to track with unresolved ones. — Bill william comptonTalk 06:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's in prep area. I'm waiting for any lead hook. It won't appear as DYK max is still at 6. — Bill william comptonTalk 03:59, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comments
Selected articles
  • Woo hoo, last section!

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/1

  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/2

  • After solving the problem, the three friends go to locations in the country where each friend chooses a sport for the group to attempt. - What country?
"They set off to Spain on a bachelor trip and meet Laila, who falls in love with Arjun and helps him overcome his problem of workaholism. Kabir and his fiancée experience significant misunderstanding. After solving the problem, the three friends go to locations in the country where each friend chooses a sport for the group to attempt."
Does it need to be mentioned again?
  • Perhaps "the three go to different locations in Spain, where ..." — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/3

  • Article has a citation needed tag.
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/4

  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/5

  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/6

  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/7

  • Article: Has a citation needed tag.
Done
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/8

  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/9

Source has no date, but the year of publication is 2006.
  • Article has way too much non free stuff. Reviews count too. Considering the prose issues (several single-sentence paragraphs) I may bring this to GAR if this isn't fixed.
Due to real life commitments I don't have any time to go through the whole article so I've replaced the blurb with another one. I hope it's fine. — Bill william comptonTalk 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.
  • New number 9
Done
  • I've nominated two non-free images from the article for deletion.
  • motor-mouthed - Non-formal. Should find a better word.
Done — Bill william comptonTalk 15:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/10

Which table?
  • The table (or other white object) she has her hands on. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done
  • Article: Numerous links that are redirects back to the same article. These appear to all be song titles.
Done
  • Article: Too many non-free images. Those screenshots fail the contextual significance clause of the NFCC.
Probably the most widespread problem of most of the users from India. What do you suggest? — Bill william comptonTalk 13:51, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nuke (remove) em. They're mostly clear violations of NFCC #8. You guys are really lucky to have so much CC stuff to work with, no need to go overboard with non-free images. I'd kill (not literally... probably) to have three or four websites which host quality CC-SA-BY images of Indonesian actors, actresses, and musicians. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/11

Done — Bill william comptonTalk 06:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/12

  • I've copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/13

  • I count numerous dead links in the article.
Done
  • I've copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/14

  • I like this song (just a comment)
  • Blurb is very well written

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/15

  • I've copyedited, be sure to double check.

Portal:Bollywood/Selected article/16

  • I've copyedited, be sure to double check.

Standardise date formats here too.

  • Finally. Done. That's everything, I think. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]