Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals/Archive/2020/September

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposals, September 2020

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another bunch of templates that have passed 60:

Waacstats (talk) 21:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Indiana Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, already has by county templates, I propose a split following the geo-stubs

This should create 3 reasonable sized categories if any are large we can follow the geo-stubs again later. To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs.Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Iowa Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, I propose we first need templates along the lines of {{FooCountyIA-NRHP-stub}} to follow Iowa-geo-stub and other state-NRHP-stub templates, see list here. Where we have 60 articles I propose the matching category. Then I propose a split following the geo-stubs

To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Illinois Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, I propose we first need templates along the lines of {{FooCountyIL-NRHP-stub}} to follow Illinois-geo-stub and other state-NRHP-stub templates, see list here. Where we have 60 articles I propose the matching category. Then I propose a split following the geo-stubs

To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

West Virginia Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, I propose we first need templates along the lines of {{FooCountyWV-NRHP-stub}} to follow WestVirginia-geo-stub and other state-NRHP-stub templates, see list here. Where we have 60 articles I propose the matching category. Then I propose a split following the geo-stubs

To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Kentucky Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, I propose we first need templates along the lines of {{FooCountyKY-NRHP-stub}} to follow Tennessee-geo-stub and other state-NRHP-stub templates, see list here. Where we have 60 articles I propose the matching category. Then I propose a split following the geo-stubs

To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tennessee Registered Historic Place stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Currently oversized, I propose we first need templates along the lines of {{FooCountyTN-NRHP-stub}} to follow Tennessee-geo-stub and other state-NRHP-stub templates, see list here. Where we have 60 articles I propose the matching category. Then I propose a split following the geo-stubs

To see which counties go where see the geo-stubs. Waacstats (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Support per nom's organization. Well done. Her Pegship (?) 19:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create speedy.
Following templates have over 60 articles, I propose categories for these

If anyone has a problem with me posting speedy nominations from various parts of the wiki together like this just let me know.Waacstats (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tidy up in football biography stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I have looked through a number of the larger fooian football biography stubs and note that we have splits for some positions but not others. To complete this split in the relative countries I propose the following templates with the categories if they reach 60 articles.

This should reduce the size of some of the larger categories and I will have a look at the rest later. Waacstats (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Conservative MP for England stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few potential splits that come to mind, by constituency, by decade of birth or by parliament. For most parliaments we could probably have a category but i think this could lead to massive amounts of multiple stubbing where MPs have sat in numerous parliaments, by constituency looks to be under categorized in the permanent categories so I suggest by decade of birth

Obviously categories only for those template which manage to pass the 60 mark. Waacstats (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of French politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Had a look at Category:French politician stubs this oversized politician category as well, looks like the following are viable

This should reduce the category below 800. Waacstats (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Australian politician stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Already have some by party splits some more which should breach the threshold and may get this below 800 are:

We will just need to look at the Category:Australian Labor Party politician stubs then, as this is also oversized. Waacstats (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Scotland football bios

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Scottish football forward stubs (808) and Category:Scottish football midfielder stubs (808) and given that Category:Scottish football biography stubs is at 644 I guess there are more to go in. I suggest splitting by dob as per the defenders

Categories only where the templates pass 60 Waacstats (talk) 23:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
A few places that I have noticed where categories could be created from existing upmerged templates.

Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of Pakistani railway station stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Category:Pakistani railway station stubs is oversized, anyone any better idea than the traditional split by province.

I note that the geo-stub category has Balochistan (Pakistan) were as the article is at Balochistan, Pakistan do we need a rename of the geo-stub cat. Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split of German noble stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
Another oversized category, based on a play with petscan the following should be viable:

Waacstats (talk) 13:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Speedy Nepal district stub cats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
{{IlamNP-geo-stub}}, {{Sunsari-geo-stub}}, {{Kaski-geo-stub}}, and {{SalyanNP-geo-stub}} have all been deployed on 60+ articles. Speedy categories? Her Pegship (?) 05:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

  • Looks good to me. Waacstats (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

German airport stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was do not create.
In order to add to the categories French/Italian/Russian/Turkish and UK airport stubs, this new cat would fit into the Category:European airport stubs.

The same applies to Category:Germany transport stubs, in which "Germany rail transport stubs" and "Germany road stubs" are already existing.

In addition, there would be a certain degree of relief of the current Category:Germany transport stubs, which is currently parent to over 100 articles. --Uli Elch (talk) 10:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Category:European airport stubs is oversized at 569 articles, but {{Germany-airport-stub}} is only linked to 36 of those articles. I suggest the template remain upmerged for now, until such time as it's used on 60+ articles. It might help for someone to assign more specific templates to the European airport stubs articles; {{Europe-airport-stub}} is used on 284 articles, and I bet some of them are in Germany. Her Pegship (?) 18:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South American hospital stubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed creation of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was create.
I would like to propose a new category, Category:South American hospital stubs. This category would be populated by two existing templates,

Currently, these two templates populated the Category:Hospital stubs (111 articles) and Category:Brazilian building and structure stubs (415 articles, for the Brazil template). The "Category:Hospital stubs" would contain non-geographic hospital stubs and stubs about hospitals in Oceania (New Zealand and other islands). Australia, which is also in Oceania, has its own category for Australia hospital stubs.

I have updated all the hospital stubs that are in the "Hospital stubs" category, so that stubs with categories use the appropriate template.

This new category would allow users to locate and improve articles more easily on South American hospital stubs.

WP:HOS -- Talk to G Moore 12:06, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals/Archive/2020/September&oldid=988524580"