Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment/2014

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Looks good enough for B unless I missed something. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aldnoah.Zero No longer a stub. Deadwikipedian 22:15, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Assessed by DragonZero as Start. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:25, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aya Hirano raised to Mid. since biography article highlights her significance. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rie Kugimiya raised to Mid. Winner of multiple seiyuu awards. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think Toyosaki at least should be Mid: she won a "Best New Voice Actress" award and a few others, Mizuki for her successful music career in Japan (probably the most successful seiyuu music career in recent times, with her releases frequently going Gold or more), Yūki and Sugita, also for awards. Not sure on the others. 00:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Aki Toyosaki raised to Mid, barely. I'll put comments on her talk page. Her notability is in the award, but her other roles need to be brought up better otherwise she's just a one-anime wonder and would have to be bumped back to Low. -AngusWOOF (talk) 03:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Needs development but hard to justify: Aoi Yuki, Haruka Tomatsu, Kana Hanazawa, Yuka Iguchi - article needs to be developed to show the significance of voice actor beyond average notability. What are her biggest roles? What are her awards and significant accomplishments? Has she headlined any anime conventions? -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Needs development: Mamiko Noto, Miyuki Sawashiro - lots of roles, but are they big and notable? -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:05, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Made some improvements to Toyosaki and Yūki's articles. Thoughts? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 05:43, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Toyosaki's at least a Seiyuu Award winner for two different years now. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nana Mizuki is already rated Mid, do you think she should be rated higher because of her popularity as a seiyu? Some of the popular manga artists haven't even been bumped to High. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC) updated -19:40, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tomokazu Sugita - hold at Low for now until his biography can be beefed up. Granted he's in a ton of roles, and his characters are popular, but needs references that demonstrate his importance in the seiyuu industry. Only one "win" at the seiyuu awards. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mamoru Miyano - Mid. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure again but I think my commentary on Love Live apply here. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's already at Mid. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:32, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's already start. It could be argued for C class but I'd like to see more content beforehand. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My bad. Popular pages still says it's stub. The article classes in that page so need updating (I nearly added Kill la Kill in this batch, until I saw it was already C-class). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Bridget Hoffman - beyond Start-class now that the article has a biography and sources. Not sure how much more I can dig up on her background. -AngusWOOF (talk) 06:01, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Very impressive for a voice actor's article... I'm hesistant to assess it as B-class; I wouldn't oppose to it, though. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B. Consider adopting the 30em for reflist instead of 2 columns. I also suggest merging the character list, and leaving only the significant information. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've assessed to Start, since it's beyond dictionary definition. Thanks for adding the list of books. -AngusWOOF (talk) 19:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Start. Needs volume list. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:58, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. It also needs a Reception section and citation for supporting characters. Need someone to assess specific criteria. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC), updated 18:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted to High importance. I'm not convinced any of the articles support that it actually influenced Avatar and Surrogates (parallels are drawn but not concrete acknowledgement), but clearly the movie has long proved it's importance and reach beyond the comparatively narrow Anime fanbase, much like Akira. Even to me, who was never really into either. SephyTheThird (talk) 19:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex - Re-assessment requested. Does it measure up to B-class; if so, what needs to be done to bring it up to GA-class? Should I perhaps go ahead and nominate it for GA-class just to see where it might fail to qualify? Thanks! -BloodDoll (talk) 00:33, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
1) Yeah, and it's already assessed as such. 2) It's a more complex discussion; it should only meet WP:GA?, though. The article talk page should be a good place to discuss it. Also, Lucia Black seems to be planning the same feat; maybe you can talk with her. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, C class. I will try to look at the outstanding criteria later. G.A.Stalk 09:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I completed it. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 21:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sailor Moon (character) - Mid - hard to say; is she as individually recognizable as Belldandy who is Mid at the moment, or should Belldandy be elevated to High? She is the face of the series. May be even higher if more Reception shows it. -AngusWOOF (talk) 14:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yui Horie is now Mid. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Haganai - TBD - light novels were popular in 2011. International reception is questionable as none of the light novels are published outside Japan. Yes it got a series or two dubbed but so what? -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deferred raising this to Mid until the Reception can be detailed better. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Familiar of Zero - TBD - was a top-selling light novel in 2008. International reception is also questionable as none of the light novels are published outside Japan, and the anime series only two of the four seasons were given dubs. -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deferred raising this to Mid until the Reception can be detailed better. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Luci Christian - TBD - notable voice actor in field, some of them are running on 10+ years now in prominent anime series, although they might not run that much higher without some big-time anime voice awards. I added most of the bio so I need someone else to assess this. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:47, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Lucky Star (manga) - TBD - is on the level of Haruhi Suzumiya in being the flagship franchise for Kyoto Animation. Not sure if it translated to success overseas though. -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Rosario + Vampire - TBD - ran for 10 years in Japan, and surprisingly enjoyed success as a translated graphic novel series on the New York Times Best Sellers. However, it doesn't have much of an influence on other anime titles or critical responses in anime discussions. -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To Love-Ru - TBD - has longevity going for it, although I don't know where it's impacted other titles besides a mention in Bakuman. I hardly see any mention of this in bookstores, libraries, or anime retail stores. Is it really comparable to Tenchi Muyo which is Mid? -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deferred raising this to Mid until the Reception can be detailed better. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kill la Kill - stays Low - series just got dubbed, no major awards or accolades
Jormungand (manga) - stays Low - went direct-to-video in US, needs to show significance in Reception section
Nisekoi - stays Low - low notability, especially in comparison to series that it references that are Mids like Love Hina)
Hidamari Sketch - stays Low - hardly influential here, sorry. I could be missing their impact on top 10 lists though, so someone should review this. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:51, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Haruhi Suzumiya - It's been more than a year since my last request. I think some merchandise is still coming out, but the manga just ended and there's been no news for the LN for several years now. High-class? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
High class would require media to still be made on the series, 20 years after its debut. Maybe if something comes out in 2023. Missing references for international licenses, so C class. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stub. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Could have a "Reception" section, though. Not a requirement but production info is always good. Note: there's GAs without "Production"/"Development", but there's no GA without "Reception". Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Start DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kanon, Air (visual novel), Little Busters! - All three of these should be Mid, particularly Kanon and Little Busters! Kanon sold extremely well for a visual novel in Japan, is the first visual novel by the company Key, and received two anime adaptations, the second one also selling pretty well. Little Busters! was one of the best selling games in 2007, was well-acclaimed, and topped or ranked high in various polls. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure again but I think my commentary on Love Live apply here. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the acclaim is for the game itself, so it should be bumped to Mid on video games and higher on visual novels if such a subgroup exists. For the anime, it just has the BD sales, which gives it kind of a direct-to-video importance. How did it fare on television or in the manga rankings? Also haven't seen the massive impact or the critical importance overseas typical of Mids. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Mid - Oops we're covering the visual novels in this project so yeah this goes to Mid. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kari Wahlgren - I need some feedback as to how to improve the Career/Biography section. I've filled out a lot for her bio concerning her work in anime, and organized her extensive filmographies, but I didn't find as much to write about from the animation and video game side, outside of a handful of notable roles. Please post on the talk page any suggestions, otherwise it's at least a C with the crazy amount of referencing for the lists to go. -AngusWOOF (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've completed referencing on this article. That stuff can be endless but it's probably now one of the most referenced voice actor filmographies in the project. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:29, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C, the issue was having sections with 2-3 sentences and unsouced voice actors. Content wasn't an issue. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 08:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kill la Kill - I've reorganized the plot, starring characters, and supported the information with extensive references. I think it should pass the remaining B-class criteria. Please post on the talk page any outstanding issues. -AngusWOOF (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing request for now. Re-org of characters list has left the structure needing better information. -AngusWOOF (talk) 02:05, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kotoko (singer) - I'm not sure if it's good enough for C-class (the article is pretty short), but I've sourced pretty much whatever can be sourced. Is it good enough? If not, what else needs to be done? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B, assuming most available sources have been used for the article's content. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Ref 1 doesn't seem to cover the airdates. You got the initial date and three broadcast stations though. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:37, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 1 helped with the Japanese titles. The series premiered on Tokyo MX. I found a link there (Ref 9) that has the airdates. —KirtZMessage 10:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, nine sources the first twelve episode airdates. Missing the last episode though. Use deadurl=no to use the live site as the main instead of the archive. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 17:39, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. They're all sourced now. Used ref 6 for the OVA. —KirtZMessage 07:42, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:32, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Too early, still list class. I think the summaries could still be boiled down to the min. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Rosario + Vampire chapters - I have provided missing summaries and links to key characters for each volume. Also updated volume references to the current Viz and Shueisha links. It should be ready for B class. -AngusWOOF (talk) 03:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C, ref issues. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 09:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Kept DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 00:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 10:11, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Was assessed to B on April 14 by DragonZero. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of Rosario + Vampire characters - The manga series has completed. This underwent a major overhaul to simplify the descriptions, add reception, and tons of references to the manga and anime. Would appreciate detailed feedback on the talk page. -AngusWOOF (talk) 22:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 00:57, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've trimmed down a bunch more details and made changes per feedback. -AngusWOOF (talk) 04:25, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Another round? I've cleaned up the jargon terms, POV/OR verbiage, organized the reception section by key topics, and beefed up the character development section. -AngusWOOF (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. Did a major reorganization to group the characters into sections and bullet lists. Hopefully the structure will work. Appreciate any additional feedback from there. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Recently I've seen lists been assessed; however, I guess there is only two kind of categories for lists: List-Class or FL-Class. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sjones23, you don't replying mean you have agreed? If so, I'll archive it. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:06, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Forget what I said; per this discussion lists assessement is valid. I will not assess it, though. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Let's set it for C-class for now but it should jump to B or FL fairly quickly when the series (or season if it's gonna be a while) finishes airing. -AngusWOOF (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's been assessed to B-class per DragonZero -AngusWOOF (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Se my opinion above on Sailor Moon Crystal. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Forget what I said; per this discussion lists assessement is valid. I will not assess it, though. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've added Home release information for this, so it's ready for another review. -AngusWOOF (talk) 21:17, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Hm... is that "School Idol Project" part of the title? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No, "School Idol Project" is just a subtitle (for example, the mobile game is called "Love Live! School Idol Festival"). Also, no comment on Importance? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, I see. I'm not sure what parameters should I use to measure the importance of an article; it's always very subjective in my opinion (more than the quality). However, our "importance" scale states (for series/mid): "Achieved wide commercial success or critically acclaimed outside of Japan". I don't know enough to confirm, but you said it is massive in Japan. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 11:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mami Kawada - Now I know this article will probably still be assessed as C, but since Kurosaki's article was just assessed as C, I was wondering if Kawada's article is getting closer to B-class. Her article fails B1 (a few parts still need sources, I'll try to get to those in a few days) and B5 (no image, but as I mentioned here last year, no free images for her seem to exist). However, B5 reads in part (italics mine): "Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included..." which means, since her article does have an infobox, and it seems no free image for her exists (at least for now), perhaps the only criteria that needs to be addressed is B1? And if so, how close is the article to B-class? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:26, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Final sentence (Tokyo Ravens part) is unsourced. Yeah, I can pass it for B5 since it can be argued free images don't exist. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyo Ravens citations added. Is it finally time for B-class? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Start. It needs a better explanation on how it relates to the manga. Is it an adaptation or an original screenplay? Also missing the list of awards and nominations from the film festivals, and its connection to the manga characters (list of X characters?) Pretty close to C though. -AngusWOOF (talk) 08:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
To be continued in Talk:Mushishi (film)#Assessment. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 23:33, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. It is short, but seems that all sections are expanded to the most (considering what's possible for now), except (maybe and just maybe) for the "Reception". Not a requirement (there's GAs without "Production"/"Development") but production info is always good. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mystery of Mamo - Complete rewrite/expansion in recent weeks. The plot summary is a mess, but frankly this is more because the plot of the film is ridiculous. Trying to summarise it while keeping it as small as possible took some effort (reduced by 400 words). I doubt it could easily be reduced further.Dandy Sephy (talk) 19:20, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 11:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nisekoi's ready for a bump, at least to C. The anime series is still ongoing, but shouldn't affect the summary or characters since there are plenty of manga chapters. If someone wants to qualify it against B standards, go for it. -AngusWOOF (talk) 05:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:54, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 11:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty well written for a new article. C. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:54, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Start DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • See Me After Class - I've added quite a lot of cleanup, information, and references to the article. I think the article should be properly assessed (though Gabriel Yuji kindly reassessed it to C-class, but informed me it's best to request an assessment) so I know how to improve the article. It would be appreciated. :) --GIR556 (talk) 14:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When I indicated this page to you it was for future articles that you could improved. I've already assessed this one so there's no need to bring it here. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. A nice platform to develop. SephyTheThird (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will have to come back to this later. I'm unsure about the structure for the plot. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's very, very close to B, but it still missing some sources. Also, the lead should summarize the entire article but it doesn't do as there's nothing about the reception on it. I think these points can be quickly addressed and then I'd be glad to assess it as a B-Class article. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 02:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Issues have been addressed. Summary of the reception has been added to the lead, and one of the uncited statements has been cited. However, as I could not find reliable sources for two of the other statements, I have removed them, though someone should be free to add them with a reliable source. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:13, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:45, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C-class. Please add a Reception section for box office figures and critics reviews. I've also removed the adaptation comparisons section in its entirety as that was original research. -AngusWOOF (talk) 18:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wāqwāq - I don't know if its plot (and maybe prose) is (are) clear enough, but now with sure better than start-class. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 07:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C. Quite a bit of grammar errors in plot and volume list. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:02, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yamishibai: Japanese Ghost Stories - I'm unsure as to whether or not C will be the highest that this page will ever attain. Nonetheless, it is definitely better since its last assessment so at least some of the remaining B-class criteria should be met. I tried getting every last scrap of information out there and this is what resulted. KirtZMail 20:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I actually have issues with the content and structure so I'll have to come back to this later. If I rated this without a second thought, I'd give it a C while failing B1 and B3. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 06:33, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. If you could give me a nudge about the structure that would be great. Also please keep in mind that this is one of the smaller series out there in terms of coverage—at least from what I can deduce. KirtZMail 15:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
C, failed B3. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 04:52, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've assessed to Start, since it's beyond dictionary definition, but it is still missing the list of episodes, list of books (even without summaries it's okay, but could use ISBN and publish dates) the list of major characters besides Yugo -AngusWOOF (talk) 08:07, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Zombiepowder. - Well, it took me six fricking years but I did eventually get back to this. This'll be a review for B grade, but feel free to mention anything you see as an issue for a GA run, since I figure I'll send it there next. --erachima talk 05:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
B. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 18:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]