Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 March 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 13[edit]

Template:Elections in Italian regions[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Izno (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bloated navbox in which every link to an election for each Italian region's elections are already covered by a respective navbox for each region. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I could agree that the navbox is bloated (I have long supported and argued for the original, slimmer version), but it is quite useful in order to navigate through the pages on elections in each Italian region or autonomous province. Also, the template is consistent with several templates. It is harmful and useful. --Checco (talk) 14:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then we could go for that version. Just link the main election article of Italian regions instead. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Whenever you want. Would you withdraw the deletion proposal and restore the slimmer version? --Checco (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the need to keep the slimmer, streamlined version of the template.--Autospark (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree, keep but simplify it Braganza (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the template according to the above consensus. The discussion should be thus closed as keep. --Checco (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Best DVD award navboxes[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsuitable to have awards navboxes for DVD re-issues, the subject of the links is the film, not the media release. Would only be acceptable if we had articles on the physical media releases themselves. How many more film award navboxes do we need?!? --woodensuperman 12:16, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Your nomination is not based in any guideline and is in fact WP:IDONTLIKEIT. As long as the main article exists and the pages linked in the navbox are related, then there is no difference between this and any other award. If you have an issue with award templates in general then start a discussion and get consensus for change. Gonnym (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not at all. There is a major difference between this and other award templates. The awards shown here are for the DVDs, i.e. the physical media releases, not for the films themselves. If we were linking between articles about the DVD then it would be a different situation, but that is not the case. The films did not win these awards, the producer of the DVD reissue did. --woodensuperman 09:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also to consider is the North American WP:BIAS, as the DVD releases that won the awards are all North American releases. These releases are irrelevant to a worldwide audience so to have these navboxes plastered on the film articles is clearly WP:UNDUE. --woodensuperman 11:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No bias here. It's a NA award for NA film on a NA article. Completely fine. I'm sure I said this before (even though I created some award navboxes myself), I believe that in general these are really a bad idea (even for Oscars) and would support deleting them all, but won't support removing some by personal taste. Gonnym (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Except it isn't fine. List of James Bond films and Mario Bava are included in {{Saturn Award for Best DVD or Blu-ray Collection}}, for some examples of non-North American properties. I don't think Mario Bava ever earned an award for a DVD release. Last time I looked La dolce vita isn't a North American film either. At risk of repeating myself, this isn't a personal taste issue. The films/series are not receiving these awards. It's the DVD or Blu-ray package, the extras, paraphernalia, etc., of the physical media product. If the award was to go to, say, The Criterion Collection, or List of Doctor Who DVD releases, then navbox inclusion would make sense. But that is not what we are seeing here. --woodensuperman 12:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Gonnym. Another "I don't like it" nomination attempting to delete awards navboxes. These little seen nominations, if done enough times about different awards, will eventually catch a few. But hopefully not these, which should stay as functional and guideline-compliant topic maps. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not remotely an I don't like it nomination. See my reasoning above. The films did not win these awards. The DVD reissues did. --woodensuperman 18:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete These awards are not for the films themselves. It's for the media format. The list articles have each film that was given the award for the media format and several of these awards are not only retired and inactive but are not defining for a navbox that connects articles. The films should be the focus of these film award navboxes not the media format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Oops - looks like I missed one: {{Saturn Award for Best Television DVD Release}}. Too late to add to nomination now? --woodensuperman 12:28, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, weakly, per nom's comments. Izno (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, not an award for the film, but an award for the dvd/blu-ray release, and the dvd/blu-ray release does not have its own article. Frietjes (talk) 23:08, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delele. Navboxes like these just add to template clutter and encourages further creation of navboxes with even more trivial intersections amongst the listed films. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Arie Azis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:50, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with two blue links and one transclusion. The subject has no WP article. DB1729talk 12:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Texas League location map[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. plicit 13:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Minor League Baseball map template. Gonnym (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: template's uses had been disabled due to a problem with a module used by the OSM location map template. That template now avoids the problematic module, so I have re-enabled this map. Waz8:T-C-E 03:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good to hear. Withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 07:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Taxonomic authority disambiguation[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused disambiguation template. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Taxonomic authorities do not need to be disambiguated. For plants and fungi, there are standardized, unique abbreviations for each authority. For animals, authorities are cited by surnames which may not be unique, but ambiguous surnames for zoological authorities can be handled by {{Surname}}.
Plantdrew (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Virusbox/parameter chk[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template after the parent template was converted to Lua. Gonnym (talk) 11:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Military history/bchecklist[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Was removed from template here. Gonnym (talk) 11:21, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Military history/Any[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in one old talk discussion. Gonnym (talk) 11:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Military history/NormalizedClass[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsed sub template. Was removed here. Gonnym (talk) 11:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Mizzou/doc[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the parent uses |DOC=auto. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Post-hardcore/invite emo[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no future usage for this as the project moved in 2014 and whoever needed be notified should have been in the last 10 years. Gonnym (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Writing sign up/bulleted[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:26, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Isn't used by its parent Template:WikiProject Writing sign up. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Before I knew about this TFD, I moved this template and its parent and sibling to Wikipedia space, because they were being used only for the WikiProject and they weren't really templates intended for transclusion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This specific wasn't used in the parent. Gonnym (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete the redirect and discuss the moved title at MFD. Frietjes (talk) 15:49, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Youth Olympic games medal count[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:45, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Seems Template:Olympic Games medal table has replaced it. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject talk other/scdecode[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Moved without redirect to User:Mathglot/Sandbox/Templates/WikiProject talk other/scdecode with comment "Still need to develop this; moved temporarily to avoid autodeletion." by Mathglot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub template. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yesno-yes/fallback[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per author request. plicit 11:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Seems it never caught on. Gonnym (talk) 10:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what I was intending to use this for. Tagged as G7. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 11:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OSM Location map/styles.css[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused style template. If added to template during this discussion, withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Multiref2/styles.css[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused style template. If added to template during this discussion, withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created it as part of this discussion: Template_talk:Unbulleted_list_citebundle/Archive_1#Templatestyles. It looks like the matter was resolved. Anyway, using the templatestyles to fix alignment in different skins was an ugly cludge and best consigned to history. —  Jts1882 | talk  14:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Edit taxonomy/styles.css[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused style template. If added to template during this discussion, withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2023 Rugby World Cup Pool D[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was subst here. Gonnym (talk) 07:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2023 Rugby World Cup Pool C[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was subst here. Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2023 Super Rugby Pacific standings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was subst here. Gonnym (talk) 07:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2002 NFC standings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 March 21. Izno (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2022 Super Rugby Pacific standings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:43, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was subst here. Gonnym (talk) 07:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2015 Super Rugby standings[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:42, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as it was subst here. Gonnym (talk) 07:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2012 Democratic Party presidential primaries imagemap[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 March 21. Izno (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Baltimore Metro SubwayLink platform diagrams[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tabular track layout diagrams of these types were deprecated in 2020: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2020#Closure of 2019 station layout RFC. That was especially true for simple double-tracked diagrams such as these. Mackensen (talk) 00:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per RfC. Gonnym (talk) 07:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Framingham station[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in the article space and duplicates {{Framingham (MBTA station)}}. Mackensen (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Island platform[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tabular track layout diagrams of these types were deprecated in 2020: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains/Archive: 2020#Closure of 2019 station layout RFC. In addition, these particular templates are only used on two articles. Mackensen (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per RfC. Gonnym (talk) 07:16, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.