Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 May 10

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 9
May 11 >

May 10[edit]

Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Südwest[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DB Regio Südwest hasn't existed since 2017. All three transclusions updated. Mackensen (talk) 19:35, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soccer at the 1999 Pan American Games[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed. We have {{Football at the Pan American Games}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment @Aidan721 any reason why you just nominated 1999 vs the other years? Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:28, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Frock Destroyers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Substantial duplication. All articles are already included at {{RuPaul's Drag Race UK}} --woodensuperman 14:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Woodensuperman, a docuseries was premiered last year (I believe), invloving the trio. If I created the docuseries, would the template be determine as a keep? — JuanGLP (talk + contribs) 15:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so really. This is more about the duplication of the navigation. Why have two navboxes with the same links on? --woodensuperman 15:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drag Race Belgique[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 17. ✗plicit 23:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Fashion Show (U.S.)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The two seasons both link to the same article, other than that we have one linked winner. Do we really need a navbox for this? WP:NENAN --woodensuperman 11:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Drag Race Sverige[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 17. ✗plicit 23:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Queen of the Universe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:PERFNAV. Contestants listed below were already known before appearance on this show, so therefore just another in a list of television performances for them. That just leaves the two season articles after the main article. WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 10:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WorldCat author[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. I will replace the remaining 6 uses with {{WorldCat}} (or {{citation needed}} where they are broken) but feel free to remove the links or replace them with something else Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:58, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G6. Technical deletions. Based on WorldCat Identities. This project ceased to exist. Please delete use and template. Same case as {{WorldCat subject}}. @Primefac: FYI. --Kolja21 (talk) 09:27, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is WP:!G6, but delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per prior discussion. Frietjes (talk) 14:43, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hold up. Maybe I'm too late given the deletion of the other templates, but the article just says that Worldcat Identities was replaced by WorldCat Entities. The links produced by this template appear to still "work", they just go to WorldCat Entities instead, which seems to provide similar data. Maybe there's a cause for *deprecation* of the template, but it probably shouldn't be outright deleted unless it was flat non-functional. (To let it still work in page histories, if nothing else.) Am I missing something here? @Kolja21, Frietjes, WikiCleanerMan, and Pppery:. (Wouldn't normally ping, but I see Frietjes is already going around deleting references, so figure that there'd be some urgency in acting sooner rather than later.) SnowFire (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    We already have Template:WorldCat for WorldCat Entities, right? * Pppery * it has begun... 16:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery: So shouldn't we be doing a mass subst which changes, say, {{WorldCat author |lccn-n84066817 |Robert Hanhart} into {{WorldCat |id=lccn-n84066817 |name=Robert Hanhart}} then, rather than deleting the template outright? (Recent diff). SnowFire (talk) 17:03, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Possibly. I supported deletion here because it seemed non-controversial following the deletion of two other templates at two prior TfDs, and don't really care what happens do the uses. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    per this discussion the problem isn't that we have two templates for the same thing, but that the link itself is of questionable value. also, in your example, the link is already in the {{authority control}} directly below. Frietjes (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The authority control template doesn't appear on mobile and I imagine has extremely little use on desktop. For authors who are both sufficiently obscure as to not really have good links on them and who also published a lot (classic case: academics publishing monographs & journal articles & the like), a Worldcat list of works can be a useful External Link IMO. SnowFire (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep with no objection to subst all uses with Worldcat per conversation above. I don't see why this potentially valid External Link should be subst'd, and the link also being in Authority Control isn't a strong objection if for some reason such a link is more relevant than usual and thus should appear more prominently / on mobile, per above examples. SnowFire (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • As a slight clarification, it seems that Frietjes already deleted all uses, so when I say "subst all uses" what I really mean is "bring the deleted versions back and then subst with the worldcat template" if desired. SnowFire (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have only deleted the ones that were irreparably broken, or where the link was also in the authority control directly below. I have kept a list of my edits and would be happy to undo them if this closes as keep or no consensus. Frietjes (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • WorldCat Entities is a new project that produces other results (entities shows persons and organisations instead a list of works). In addition, like Frietjes pointed out, many links were broken or useless. Examples:
The old IDs were mainly based on LCCN and VIAF so no information get lost. Last not least: We talking about 6 articles that are using this outdated template. For WorldCat Entities a new template should be created. --Kolja21 (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please see also Template talk:WorldCat#Update and clarification needed. --Kolja21 (talk) 00:45, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:RuPaul's Secret Celebrity Drag Race[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 May 17. ✗plicit 23:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Battleshort[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not used at all. In this case, we should delete. Q𝟤𝟪 08:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Even if this is subst, it's not much of a shortcut! --woodensuperman 12:37, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:47, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I would hesitate deleting this because, as Trainsandotherthings has said to me before, writing out these links in source is tedious. I've not used nor plan to use this template, so take my keep with a grain of salt. We'll know if it breaks someone's workflow if someone complains. SWinxy (talk) 00:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I suspect you've confused me for someone else, I don't recall ever using templates like this one. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:34, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Someone did on the Discord. If it wasn't you then I have no idea. SWinxy (talk) 02:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TextMirror[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been used since it was created. Q𝟤𝟪 08:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was created only two months ago, which is a bit quick for an unused template nomination. Since we're here, though, and there's none of the other indicia of use, delete as unused, unless the creator opines otherwise * Pppery * it has begun... 22:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as totally unnecessary being a trivial application of the underlying template. Izno (talk) 21:38, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Phl browse[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:43, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like he's completely useless. Q𝟤𝟪 08:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Resolve2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is not used now because it is too difficult to remember. Q𝟤𝟪 08:03, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Db-meta/sandbox/a7[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason, he is no longer used by anyone. Q𝟤𝟪 08:01, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a sandbox, it is not expected to be used anywhere. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are very few instances where a non-standard sandbox should be used, and most of those are for limited time tests. Seeing how this sandbox has only 1 edit and that is from 12 years ago, this sandbox can go. Not every test someone does should be kept forever. Gonnym (talk) 14:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gonnym. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Created as a test per the creation edit summary. Can't be a test for this long. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:51, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Topic survey1[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This content is obsolete and no longer in use. Q𝟤𝟪 08:00, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LDS Temple list/size-floor-height-site[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is no longer being maintained due to obsolescence Q𝟤𝟪 07:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Navbar/testcases/teststyles.css[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, this page is not being used Q𝟤𝟪 07:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a sandbox, it is not expected to be used anywhere. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've deleted it as G7 since it's not a particularly useful sandbox. Izno (talk) 17:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:COVID-19 pandemic interactive maps/India/India Map Data.json[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:41, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, this interface is no longer used Q𝟤𝟪 07:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Usertalk footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza is no more Arlo James Barnes 06:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think you may be misunderstanding the purpose of this template. It's a template with an obsolete Esperanza parameter, but it's not an Esperanza template. - Eureka Lott 15:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • While Eureka Lott is correct, this should still be substed and deleted as it's only used in one place + the nominator's sandbox. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:50, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst on the only place used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:West Texas United Sockers[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a navbox that only links to two articles, which doesn't seem particularly useful, especially given that each article already has a link to the other in its infobox. (To clear any confusion: West Texas United Sockers is the former name of West Texas FC; the template is out of date.) IagoQnsi (talk) 06:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_May_10&oldid=1155389464"