Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 December 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 10[edit]

Template:Alkaline earth metals[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single usage navbox. Not sure why it isn't used on any of the metal pages. Either it isn't needed and should be deleted, or it should be added to those pages. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added to all of those pages. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 08:40, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sachin Tendulkar[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One of the links is to "Superfan" which just about sums this up. It is hero worship and surely unnecessary, and of limited if any use. Batagur baska (talk) 16:24, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough sensible blue links to justify a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I've reorganized the entry by adding entries from his category and finding any related articles through his main article. The template has enough links now. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 10:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep well organized and could help the article. LuxembourgLover (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Campaignbox 2023 Guayana Esequiba crisis[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For some reason we have a campaignbox template for a political crisis without a single military engagement. The only that could really qualify is 2023 Guyana Defence Force helicopter crash. Delete per WP:TOOSOON. This is not a war and if it becomes one we will make a campaignbox for it in its due time. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 10:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As said in the nomination, this box is WP:TOOSOON and there has been no direct armed confrontation. If something happens, we can come back to this. WMrapids (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. SamPro910 (talk) 13:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, yeah I don't know why it was even created. Also, do we even need the article on the helicopter crash? It was probably an unrelated accident, and WP:NOTNP. This would be like making an article about the Brazilian army truck that blew up near the boarder... in an accident. FelipeFritschF (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Considering that it had several deaths all of which were Guyanese military officers rather than simple soldiers and that "The crash marked the deadliest incident in Guyana's military history", I would ask for a more in depth analysis on the topic's notability before getting rid of the article. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 20:10, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The deaths were attributed to an accident, not due to direct combat involving a military campaign. Again, if military action were to occur, we can revisit this. We also have Template:Guyana–Venezuela territorial dispute, which seems sufficient for now. WMrapids (talk) 06:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.