Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< January 12 January 14 >

January 13[edit]

Template:Ifexist subpage[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chadic languages[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Superseded by {{Afroasiatic languages}}, which contains all of these navboxes and a few more. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a pointless wrapper. If the intention is to only have those 4 navboxes on Chadic languages, then use those 4 templates. We don't need a template that holds those templates for that. Gonnym (talk) 23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gonnym. In fact a wrapper for navboxes is nearly always counterproductive. Having to open a wrapper before opening a second template is all going to discourage users from using these for their actual purpose, navigation. Nigej (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PartofWPIran[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. If we ever tagged WikiProject pages in this non-obvious way, we no longer do so; categories work just fine. See previous TFD (December 2020) about a similar template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Also note that there are at least a dozen or so similar templates that have a few transclusions but that are probably similarly inappropriate. Since they are transcluded, they should not be added to this nomination, but a separate nomination would be fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I've never noticed these but these are really bad. Template:PartofWPLDS for example is used directly on articles. Gonnym (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment The solution obtained from the TfD for "PartofWPPUNJAB" was to move it into projectspace as a subpage. This could be carried out for all of these that were discovered. Wikipedia:WikiProject Punjab/PartofWPPUNJAB (2017 TfD) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment These are all formatted the same way. A MetaTemplate should be built, instead of each of these coding their own divs. That would standardize the look and the templates could all then be traced back to the metatemplate. These all look akin to {{topicon}} ; perhaps that could be used as a solution to standardizing these. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have WikiProject banners that go on talk pages. There is no reason for another tag on the non-talk page. Gonnym (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment looks like {{PartofWPIran}} was replaced by {{PartofWPIran2}} -- therefore REDIRECT {{PartofWPIran}} to {{PartofWPIran2}} -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete All completely unnecessary. eg Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran/Open Tasks (tagged with {{PartofWPIran2}}) doesn't need to be so tagged, its clearly part of the project from its name and the banner on the talk page. So the template simply provides a clickable flag which takes you to the project page. If the article is in the right place (as here) it's very easy to get there anyway and if it's not, it needs moving. Worse, some of these "PartofWP..." templates are now in user talk pages. Nigej (talk) 08:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parties-content[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. The only substantive edits were creation in 2005. This may have been used at one time, but its utility appears to have diminished to zero. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Participating nations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Primefac (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Empty template created by Primefac, who knows which way is up but who appears to have abandoned this idea after creating this placeholder. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Participant editor and sibling templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except on one user page. These are all except one of the templates in Category:Outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org course templates; they appear to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parks and commons of Bury[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Sidebar with no main article and only four linked articles. Category:Parks and commons in the Metropolitan Borough of Bury is probably sufficient to link these articles together. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Used to be a few articles (4, I suspect) after creation in 2008 but has since been removed from them all. Fails much of what makes a good sidebar, in particular, there's no parent article. Nigej (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parameter footer[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Only substantive edits were creation in 2007. Template:Parameter footer: searching for the name of this template in template space turns up nothing, so it does not appear to be called by any other templates. The same is true of Template:parameter header – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete both per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment a rough doc added -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment it looks like it was supposed to be used as template documentation to standardized soccer template parameter tables -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Perhaps some plan to standardise documentation of the fb templates, but seemingly never used. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 11:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Enlargeddanishmunic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is banner cruft from 15 years ago. Recommend total deletion. Izno (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peer review transclusion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never caught on. Would favor removal of the table elements and subsequent subst/deletion. Izno (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan nuke plant map[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Nuclear power in Pakistan uses a straightforward location map, so a single-use template page is probably not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uvs Nuur discussion[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification template from 14 years ago that would normally be in plain text these days. Izno (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Highly specific template created 14 years ago and left unused waiting to be deleted. Nigej (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete. No longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polyglot RFD[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basically unused after 15 years. Izno (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete A template to notify readers of an article that another language Wikipedia is considering deleting its version of the article. Looks like it was used once, in 2007. Nigej (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment if kept, it should be converted to a notice boilerplate text subst-only template, like other deletion notification templates (ie. {{TFDnote}} ) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lambda Sigma Upsilon articles[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on two articles (one after I remove it in a moment), with a half-dozen links to the main page and little else. Basically, there isn't enough here to merit a sidebar. Primefac (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article and date[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused but also it's more simple to just use a pipe and a label. The 3rd example is just a complete MOS:EGG. Gonnym (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used on the wrong pages and this is not a country but an international political organization. Has no real chance of usage. The user who created this has been doing disruptive editing and two of his alt accounts have been blocked permanently. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern portal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Listed as under construction since it was restored in 2018. After asking at WikiProject Portals, it seems this was never used. Gonnym (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Purge link portals2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used in one portal but does the same exact thing as Template:Purge link portals just resizing it a little. I don't think that the resize is helpful, but even if it were, a resize parameter could have been added. No need for another template. To be clear though, I propose a replacement and deletion, not a merge, as 489 portals work fine with the standard size compared to this one usage. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Replace/delete per nom. Surely we want a common style. I'd be against a resize parameter. Nigej (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ten portals links[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in actual portals and only used in two archived talk pages. Should be subst there and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PBIE[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now unused after I replaced the single use at Template:User Republic of Ireland/cat with {{Pbox|Republic of Ireland}}. Gonnym (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Just provided a different flag in a link to a portal. Nigej (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal-image[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portal templates. Gonnym (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NCAA Division I men's lacrosse independents navbox[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. None of these teams are independent today, so there is no possible use for this navbox at this time. Most have joined the ASUN Conference. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Ceased to have a useful purpose. Clearly intended to be a current list. Nigej (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Myanmar 1980s estab by year[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by {{EstcatCountryDecade|Myanmar}} in Category:1980s establishments in Myanmar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fix {{EstcatCountry}} and use it per Fayenatic. Fix EstcatCountry either by using {{Resolve category redirect}} or by placing a specific Burma check for years 1980-1988. In categories it is better to use one of the category templates than use manual categories as changes to the template will be missed by those not using it. Gonnym (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as unused. The rest of this discussion belongs elsewhere since nobody is arguing for returning this template to use. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiple place names[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Was once used at Wikipedia:Multiple-place names, which is now an empty historical page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MormonCollaboration[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. May have been used at one point, but no longer appears to be useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Anjou[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Empty data cells. These templates appear to have been designed for single-article use at 2021 Montreal municipal election, but there are already tables in that article. Delete, or userfy if the creator would like to keep the image cells and add them to the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. And as they said, even if it were used, it would still be single used template which would be much better in the article itself. Gonnym (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. and personally I prefer the style that is currently used. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hitastigar[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created in 2015 and unused other than in the creator's sandbox. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of English monarchs[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in a user's page which hasn't been edited since 2012. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as unused. We've drifted away from this style of timeline. Just looks a mess. Can't see us going back to them. Nigej (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cost of energy sources[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace and only used in two archived talk pages. Subst there and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was proud of this at the time, but it seems nobody updated it and it was removed in 2014 by Johnfos. As you say, it should be preserved in discussion of its removal started by J. D. Redding, and the reference debate on modifying it (otherwise the discussion is rootless - notwithstanding it seems to have been started by a sockpuppeter...), but if not actively used there is no need to keep it as a template. GreenReaper (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst/Delete per nom. Can't see a need for it, even if it was updated. Nigej (talk) 12:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Australian PM[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in a talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete As with so many of these timelines, they date back to the early days when such things were quite common. Won't get used again IMO. Nigej (talk) 12:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1973 Atlantic hurricane season timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused other than in an abandoned user's page which hasn't been edited by them since 2009. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/Delete per nom. Seems to be a one-off, no other years. Nigej (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Bose 2.1 systems[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused Bose related timeline templates that were created over 11 years ago. The pages that I found that could theoretically host these are Bose headphones, Bose shelf stereos, and List of Bose home audio products, however if after 11 years these aren't used then these are probably not wanted and I won't be adding them. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geological category see also/core[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geological category see also was converted to Lua making these sub templates obsolete. Gonnym (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No longer needed. — hike395 (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lunar geological period[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused geological period template. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Christianity in Wales[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Culture of Wales. ✗plicit 13:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links. Recommend merging the most relevant links into {{Culture of Wales}}, which has a "Religion" subhead but no section to expand under the subhead. If this closes as "merge", and someone pings me, I'll be happy to perform a selective merge. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge Seems a very sensible way forward. Nigej (talk) 07:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Australia/States[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 05:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. These sidebars appear to have been abandoned in favor of their parent template, {{History of Australia}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Western U.S. majority-minority counties[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to TfD so this might not be the best phrased argument, but this seems like a version of CROSSCAT for templates. I do understand all of these counties are Majority-minority counties, but that seems like not enough of a notable piece of information about these counties to group them together in a template. Maybe this might work a bit better as a category? TartarTorte 01:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me ping WikiCleanerMan to see if they're on board with adding that as well as they already !voted, but I agree those templates should also be listed and if WCM is ok with that I'll list those as well. TartarTorte 15:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I support deleting those as well. The same issues are with those as with the template nominated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sweet, adding them in. TartarTorte 16:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Proterozoic time scale[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused geological eon template. Gonnym (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carbonate[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete except IC50. ✗plicit 05:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above are all unused chemical related templates. Gonnym (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 19:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_January_13&oldid=1066953736"