Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 September 24

September 24

Template:Rr/1801abun.book.....B

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Opabinia regalis (talk) 18:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

• Template:Rr/1801abun.book.....B (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above list of templates are unused reference templates. The consensus of the 2010 and 2012 TfDs was to delete the RR template, so I see no reason why the sub-templates shouldn't be deleted as well. Primefac (talk) 22:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete after substing any transclusions. No need to hive reference info into subtemplates, especially as part of a template that has itself been deleted. I would support the same course of action even for the subtemplates that are used. Modest Genius ^talk 10:30, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

These are all of the subtemplates. Primefac (talk) 13:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah yes, that's because you substituted all of the ones that were being used just before opening this nomination. That seems like the wrong way around to me, but I won't labour that point. My !vote is still to delete the lot. Modest Genius ^talk 16:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, it probably wasn't the best way to get from A to C. I'll keep that in mind for next time. Primefac (talk) 16:31, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Please see WP:JUSTAVOTE. --TL22 (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per CSD G8. Nominator has made a good point. --TL22 (talk) 13:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).