Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 January 20

< January 19	January 21 >

January 20[edit]

Template:ASAP Nast[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as redundant to {{ASAP Mob}} Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ASAP Nast (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Content already adequately covered by {{ASAP Mob}}, no need for separate template. Giant Snowman 13:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as redundant per nom —PC-XT+ 10:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Columbia County public schools[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete with no objection against userfication for further development on request Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Columbia County public schools (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only links to two articles. ...William 13:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which rule are you citing? Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 11:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a rule, but a consensus about the minimum amount of links a template needs....William 00:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or userfy as premature (for recreation/moving back to template space when the articles are created) —PC-XT+ 10:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Political parties in Donetsk People's Republic[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2015 February 8. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 04:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ACTinttop & NSWinttop[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was subst and delete' per nom. The discussion about converting in to a wrapper didn't pan out, and no strong preference for it was expressed in the first place Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ACTinttop (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:NSWinttop (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Hardcoded instances of {{AUSinttop}} with few transclusion; suggest deleting after substituting in articles. - Evad37 [talk] 01:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It might be better to leave them and convert them into wrapper templates. --Rs chen 7754 02:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe for ACTinttop, as that one actually changes the sub1 column name to District, but otherwise both are just AUSinttop with <ref>s hardcoded in. - Evad37 [talk] 09:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Keelboats worldwide[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as overly broad. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 10:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Keelboats worldwide (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with too broad scope, it cannot list all keelboats. Smartskaft (talk) 00:29, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unscoped and incomplete and (IMO) of little practical use. There are probably hundreds of classes. Categories would work better. Moondyne (talk) 01:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.