Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 December 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 9[edit]

Template:Telefónica Europe[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Telefónica Europe (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I have removed this template from most of the articles it appeared in, as it is now outdated and no longer required. The company itself was replaced this year by a restructuring of Telefónica itself, and its subsidiaries have now been significantly reduced in number by a series of sales. There is now no longer any need for a Telefónica Europe template. Cloudbound (talk) 14:27, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Saltatio Mortis[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Saltatio Mortis (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with one directly-related article. A lot of red links but the template was created in March 2014, so plenty of time to have created more articles by now. As it stands now, it does not further aid in navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 11:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Reflections[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:48, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Reflections (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only 3 unique links, all of which already link to and from one another without need of the NavBox. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 08:23, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Interwiki category[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:42, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Interwiki category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{sisterlinks}} and only transcluded in three places. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as redundant, as far as I know —PC-XT+ 07:50, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/Weak keep appears to be for linking to categories, not everything, which would be what a category page on Wikipedia would want to link to (another category, not an article page) "sister links" would need several switches to be able to identify particular pages to link to instead of doing a search at each project. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 11:37, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • @67.70.35.44: I don't understand. It's no more difficult to input s=Category:Thomas Aquinas than it is to input s=Author:Thomas Aquinas or s=Thomas Aquinas or anything else. I don't understand... —Justin (koavf)TCM 08:00, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, the standard practise is to use the various subboxes (e.g., see Category:1982). Frietjes (talk) 18:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Years in golf[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deletePlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:38, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Years in golf (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It duplicates the template golf, which also has entries for all the years in golf. ...William 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.