Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 April 12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 12[edit]

Template:Imagine tracks[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Imagine tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant template and there's precision to delete all such track list templates as they are considered useless since there is a {{XXArtist singles}} template always, in this case its {{John Lennon singles}} —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 16:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2014 Ukrainian states[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:12, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2014 Ukrainian states (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

3/4 of articles mentioned are AfD, two are entirely non notable and imaginary; all flags used are user generated and not real (fan fiction) Львівське (говорити) 15:59, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's wait until those AfDs finish and then act upon their result. Feon {t/c} 16:07, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Feon, for now this template actually helps navigate these articles. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seeing a new thing has come up I am going with delete per my comment below. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 01:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tamar Kaprelian[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tamar Kaprelian (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Too few links to satisfy WP:NENAN; only one song and one album along with the artist's main page.  Gongshow   talk 04:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kanibal[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kanibal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Articles on the artist and EP have been deleted. "Related articles" typically do not count towards WP:NENAN. No other blue links.  Gongshow   talk 04:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SoMo[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SoMo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

While a navbox may be warranted in the future, at this time WP:NENAN would seem to apply - too few links.  Gongshow   talk 04:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IXpress[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IXpress (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox which does not properly navigate. Most entries are red linked items that will never be created or are not linkable. These places are only bus stops with the addition of a few bus terminals which are already covered by {{GRT Terminals}} - Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:19, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, delete. Even though I just added all the 203 stops this morning, that only goes to prove how thoroughly useless this has become. Once Ion gets closer to being finishes, a template for its stations will certainly suit this better. Radagast (talk) 19:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because I agree that not navigating makes it useless. Martin Morin (talk) 17:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.