Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 53

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 → Archive 60

Counterfire (organisation)

Other, smaller (if newer) far left groups maintain entries on Wikipedia eg Workers' Power, Alliance for Workers Liberty, etc. Counterfire contains significant figures on UK far left, including John Rees, Lindsey German, Clare Solomon. Counterfire website amongst the most visited left sites in UK. Entry therefore meets Wikipedia significance criteria. -195.195.176.1 (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
I think you should reconsider this, yes it's likely that this organization isn't notable but it was created by a here compliant editor and PRODed by an ip without an edit summary as its only edit. User:PatGallacher should be allowed to make his case for inclusion in an AFD if he wishes to do so. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

zangersheide

It says the page was deleted because it was advertising a farm. Zangersheide is the name of a farm that produces a breed of horse by the same name. The page was not advertising the farm, it was providing valuable information about Zangersheide horses and the fact that they are from the Zangersheide farm is relevant because they are a new and rare breed which is still developing. -24.160.177.22 (talk) 01:38, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done See WP:UPANDCOMING. If and when they become notable, then an article could be created. --Orange Mike | Talk 12:53, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
The entire article was the sentence Zangersheide is a warmblood horse registry founded in 1992 which breeds show jumping horses with a link to the farm. This was borderline G11 so I'm unfortunately forced to endorse this. However, any here compliant editor is free to write a new article if there are independent sources discussing this breed, otherwise it's "spam". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:32, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Build-To-Order_(HDB),_Punggol

reasoning -203.126.130.140 (talk) 05:54, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Question? Nothing to do This page has not been deleted. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Probably Build-To-Order (HDB), Punggol · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions], which was deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion, restored and deleted again for the same reason as the original deletion. Maybe there was an old version to revert to, or it was restored because it should have been a PROD or AFD. Peter E. James (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC) Another possibility is that it was only restored as a redirect, but it wouldn't be useful now as there's nothing relevant in the current version of the article. Peter E. James (talk) 16:21, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Zwinky

This page was edited by students in the "Online Communities" class at Cornell University. As their instructor, I would like to see what their contributions were before the page was deleted. Thank you. -LeshedInstructor (talk) 12:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

my love never faked

some one mischievously wrote improper information so that such a page could not be created -Manpower121 (talk) 17:50, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Loganroxoffsox1

This page was recently deleted because it said it was about a person or group and said it dident state why it was significant, but i dont see why it has to be significant to not be deleted, because wikipedia is for people to get on and learn about things, and if non-significant things get deleted how is anyone going to know about them. Thank you for taking time to consider undeleting my page -Loganguy123 (talk) 04:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Skier Dude (talk) 06:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Corporate Heights.jpg

File is free and permitted for commercial reuse and derivative works -Chesh2409 (talk) 04:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done - Image needs proof of release of (c) - please follow the instructions for WP:OTRS on your talk page. Skier Dude (talk) 06:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Wildcat Victory

Was PRODed as "Non notable uni sports song". K-State is not a "non notable" university. I have used this page for information before, and now the only information regarding K-State's fight song is a paragraph in the K-State Bands page, which links to this page that is now missing. (along with over 100 other links to this deleted page that I found while looking for more information on the song -Beaufish2008 (talk) 05:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Bumpers (album)

the rationale for deletion appears to have been a value judgment - the page was described as 'non-notable'. some people want even 'non-notable' information. -78.146.108.136 (talk) 18:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 19:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Gustavo Lopez Musician

reasoning -184.144.56.99 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Want to know why this page was deleted???

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gustavo López (musician), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 23:18, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File: Delivery Center - Gurgaon

I have fixed the problem, file is free and thus permitted for commercial reuse and derivative works -Chesh2409 (talk) 04:01, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done No such image or anything near that file name. Skier Dude (talk) 06:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Delivery Center - Gurgaon.jpg is not yet deleted. It must be released under a specified license. Saying "Free" is not clear enough. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Sexlog

Sexlog is a social network with more than 1,2 million users. Is important to Wikipedia have some information about -Gustavofn (talk) 02:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a G11. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other two deletions are an A7 and an R1, neither of which are undeletable, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

ClarencePerry1935.jpg

several usually acceptable rationales for free use of the image were given but it was deleted anyway -Teda13 (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 Done Needs to be restored to article as you deem appropriate. Skier Dude (talk) 23:13, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
It's back with the article I found it for - thanks much! Teda13 (talk) 04:22, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Abir (jewish martial art)

please return it back. beside Yehoshua Sofer life, there is a full article in the Hebrew Wikipedia tells the story of this ancient jewish martiol arts. פארוק (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? Note that WP:Notability (as in the policy itself) varies from Wikipedia to Wikipedia. In other words, what passes muster at one won't pass muster at all the others. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 16:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
It was redirected and still exists in the history, so undeletion is not needed. Unless the issues at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abir (martial art) can be resolved, either through editing or deletion review, it should stay as a redirect. Peter E. James (talk) 17:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
The version discussed at AFD was moved to Yehoshua Sofer, so there may be more content available in the history of that page. Peter E. James (talk) 17:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

3rd season episodes of The O.C.

I PRODded these above articles, let them be deleted, and created them as redirects. Due to popular demands and reasonable, convincing intentions of preserving history logs, I request recovery of previous revisions without reverted these pages back to their former selves. In other words, recover history while leave them as they are. Still, I'm not too sure. I hope previous revisions do not infringe copyrights as articles of All My Children characters have. --Gh87 (talk) 06:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done - they were indeed largely copyvios. A Google search for specimen sentences shows identical text all over the Web, some sites but not all acknowledging Wikipedia as the source. In particular, identical text is here and here marked "From : The O.C. Official - FOX". That's a dead link, but it seems clear that, as so often with episode articles, they have been copied from an official guide. There may be un-copyvio versions in the history, but I don't think it's worth the work to check that out just in order to do a partial history-restore behind a redirect. JohnCD (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Jonathan Irwin

To whom it may concern, I was rather alarmed to find when I logged in that my article had been deleted. It was only in the beginning process and I was not aware that unpublished items were under threat. My main distress is, I have no saved draft of my article, therefore I would be immensely grateful if you could retrieve it. In future I will make sure to have sufficient sources clearly added from the beginning. Kindest Regards, Lily Irwin. -Lilyirwin1989 (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done sort of, emailed copy of text to user. GB fan 14:34, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1952_Aer_Lingus_C-47_crash

notable air accident -Footix2 (talk) 08:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

This article was created by banned user, but as it is deleted I am unable to see the quality of the content.

I would be willing to make edits to this article if it was undeleted to improve the quality, rather than having to create the article again from scratch. I suspect the content was largely acceptable and the article was only deleted as it was created by banned user (and had few other edits).

Thanks

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Footix2/1952 Aer Lingus C-47 crash. GB fan 12:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

ideapreneur

unfair deletion. The word does exist. if you google the word you will see many articles relating to the word. How wikipedia can not define the word ideapreneur when it is a recognised course being taught in the capital of the most technological, innovative country in the world is beyond me. Please see School of Communication Arts 2.0 where the school charges £3000 a term to study this a credible qualification recognised by the London school of Arts. -92.238.35.202 (talk) 11:39, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Your posting here only confirms that the deletion was sound, as it reads like a sales pitch. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 12:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Buckling Restrained Brace

OTRS permission received for content at http://www.starseismic.eu/ under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL by authorized representative writing from the same domain as the website. Ticket 2011102010005766. -– Adrignola talk 14:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

50/50 Twin

Artist has released 6 albums -Ei1sos (talk) 20:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Entrapped novel

Can you please tell me the reason for deleting my page. I am new to wikipedia. Please tell me i can remove some tags & edit it again.

Thanks, Sneha Kedar -Entrapped novel (talk) 20:52, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done Given that you are (or at least claim to be) the author of this newly-published book, and that the "article" was an advertisement for your non-notable book. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

A few requests

Same with this one: I requested its deletion and thought better of it -Ncboy2010 (talk) 00:17, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done -- DQ (t) (e) 04:04, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Adirondack Trailways ticket

internet froze -74.76.210.128 (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Nor have Adirondack Trailways Ticket or Adirondack trailways ticket or any other variation I have tried. We cannot help you unless you give the exact title of the article or (if you wrote it) log in next time before you reply here, so that we know your user name and can look in your deleted contribution history. JohnCD (talk) 20:40, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
It's possible that his connection died as he was tying to create the article and it was never actually created. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Cephalopholis argus at Kona.jpg

Deleted as Commons duplicate - however, there was an older version of the image that I was hoping to move over to Commons as well. -Kelly hi! 16:42, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

  •  Done old version only restored - do you want it moved? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
  • I'll take care of it (if CommonsHelper decides to work today). Thanks! Kelly hi! 21:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

MAKULILO

I wrote an article about Ernest Makulilo (Makulilo, Jr.) but it has been deleted, and the reason is that no reliable sources. But in that article there are so many sources like Marshall University newspaper, US Embassy website, University of San Diego website etc. What refences do you REALLY need??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MASAMI101 (talk • contribs)

MASAMI

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. He won a scholarship, blogs, and is said to be writing a book. So what? --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

entrepreneurize

I think this phrase has a good grammatical structure and using this word can simply open many doors in entrepreneurship. In fact this word will bring entrepreneurship to reality and our everyday life -68.4.53.80 (talk) 00:04, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done This was deleted as a blatant and unsalvageable advertisement for a non-notable neologism coined this year by a non-notable person (who was probably the author of the "article" and this REFUND as well). --Orange Mike | Talk 00:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PunBB

It usefull for many people -Dimkalinux (talk) 19:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


Administrator who deleted page not hear any of our arguments http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jayjg#PunBB_deletion

information Note: The page is, at present, a redirect to FluxBB. Reading over the thread there it looks like discussion is still ongoing. You're jumping the gun here. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 20:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Currently is a second discusion with moderator - previus is deleted. We are waiting 3 month. And as results - no results. And no answer to simple question - why on PunBB page worked redirect to our fork.

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Okay, I see the discussion now, and it looks like it failed an Articles for Deletion debate (linked above). REFUND cannot and will not undelete pages that have failed an AfD debate; you need to go to WP:Deletion review to get this sorted, but I don't anticipate you having much luck. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

bln murthy

reasoning -Munry v (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

BLN Murthy India coach for taekwondo

 Not done. The deleted article said only "B.L.N MURTHY IS A INDIA COCHE (TAEKWONDO)." That is not enough for an article - you need to make clear who he is, what he does, and why he is important. Read WP:Your first article before you try again, particularly the bits about WP:Notability and references. JohnCD (talk) 17:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Rune_Linding

should be filled in with biography information about this person who runs a major research group www.lindinglab.org -2.108.0.96 (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. The article deleted over five years ago said only "Dr Rune Linding is currently a postdoctoral Fellow in the Pawson Lab at SLRI - Mt. Sinai and in the Yaffe Lab at MIT." You are welcome to create an article about him if he now meets Wikipedia's WP:Notability standard - see also WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (academics). You will need to register an account, which is easy and free, and you should read WP:Your first article before you start. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)

Please return it back. Beside it being deleted on 25 November 2009 by Jayjg (talk). I would like to know the reason for the deletion of Tinchy Stryder's song "Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)", by Jayjg once again on 23 October 2011, after 4 years and 7 months of the song being released as the first official single from Tinchy Stryder's debut studio album Star in the Hood on 9 April 2007?. I have left Jayjg a message on their user talk page, but I have yet to receive a reply to the explanation of the article being re-deleted. The reason given for deletion on 25 November 2009 by Jayjg was that the song lacked notability to Tinchy Stryder. But here in 2011, I have collected this Twitter status from Tinchy Stryder from 18 October 2011, clearly confirming that the "Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)" is a notable song to Tinchy Stryder after 4 years and 7 months. Here is the Twitter status of the song confirmation, just click on this link ----> http://twitter.com/#!/TinchyStryder/status/126257795321430016, so what I'm trying to get at is that if Wikipedia administrators such as Jayjg are deleting articles or not including songs that a notable artist clearly states as one of their notable songs especially one that is the first single from their debut studio albums, then what good does it do to the artist work throughout their music career and for people using Wikipedia as a verifiable and correct information website or encyclopedia on peoples. I find it amusing that the website http://www.grimepedia.co.uk/wiki/Breakaway and http://www.grimepedia.co.uk/wiki/Star_In_The_Hood gets the information about Tinchy Stryder and his 2007 single "Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song)" and 2007 debut studio album Star in the Hood more accurate than that of Wikipedia. I would possibly go as far as to say perhaps people should visit that website for a verifiable biography of Tinchy Stryder. Please if you can possibly now un-delete the "Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder)" Wikipedia article that I have recently re-created for this reason I have stated above. Thank you.
MarkMysoe (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakaway (Tinchy Stryder song), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jayjg (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 21:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Kent Holtorf

The editor who requested "speedy deletion" is "This editor is being considered for deletion in accordance with the editor deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the execution at this editors's trial on the Editors for deletion page. Feel free to talk to the user, but the editor must not be helped until the discussion is closed." I had no time to address the accusation that the article was "promoting" a company. The article listed several negative and controversial factors about Kent Holtorf. It discussed his treatment strategies in an unbiased manner. -Zoeyeve (talk) 17:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Note that the "editor for deletion" process isn't a legitimate Wikipedia process; it's just for laughs. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

In light of the fact that the "editor for deletion" tag is just a joke, I would still like to request the article be undeleted. It was modeled after another doctor article titled "Joseph Mercola" which has not been flagged for deletion. The tone was neutral and it was edited by another editor first who did not see a need for deletion. I am more than willing to revise if I know what it was the editor was calling "promotional" or "unambiguous". Editor sites the page "came across altogether too much like an advertisement" because "so many of the references were actually to his own publications, articles, papers, etc", but the reference proportion was 10 direct references vs. 16 secondary sources- which is not far from the 'Joseph Mercola' reference proportion of 14 direct references vs. 32 secondary sources. Also the Commons:Deletion Policy lists "Advertising or self-promotion." under Reasons for General Deletion, while Speedy Deletion Nominations do not list that, but are limited to "Files Corrupted, infected by a virus, unintentionally blank, etc. (if in doubt, list it on Commons:Deletion requests as an unknown format/content). Has previously been deleted under Commons deletion guidelines. Was uploaded with the intent to be used solely for purposes of vandalism, personal attacks, and/or spamming. Pages Empty and has no significant history. Patent nonsense, a test or vandalism. A user page or subpage whose deletion has been requested by the user. A user page or subpage of a nonexistent user. A redirect over which another page must be moved. A redirect to a nonexistent page. A category with no content or containing only a parent category. A talk page of deleted content (unless they contain anything worth saving)." Zoeyeve (talk) 14:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. Commons is a quite separate organization, holding images for use on any Wikimedia project, and has its own separate policies. The Wikipedia speedy deletion criteria do include WP:CSD#G11 "Unambiguous advertising or promotion." In any case, pages deleted as promotional are not restored here: what you should do is, first approach the deleting administrator, user Fox (talk); then, if your concerns are not met, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Okay, thank you! This is all so discombobulating. Zoeyeve (talk) 17:20, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Half Way to Hell Club

Historical document owned by the Zampa Family and the non-profit Alfred Zampa Memorial Bridge fund. The letter head shows the formal nature of an otherwise informal club. -Gav Thorpe (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. If you're seeking undeletion of the file (as the page presently exists and thus needs no undeletion) then indicate as much in the future. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 15:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Chaar

Could you please userify or email me the text of this article so I can use it off site. -Mathewignash (talk) 09:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done, text of article emailed to Mathewignash. GB fan 12:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Joyride (Transformers)

A second one. Please restore to my userspece or email to me for use off site. Thanks -Mathewignash (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done - emailed. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Getaway (Transformers)

A third one to be hosted off site. -Mathewignash (talk) 21:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done - emailed. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

List_of_ubiquitous_computing_research_centers

Dear Fastily

I am from the Ubiquitous Computing research community. I had been referring to and contributing the page for a long time now.

Although recently, some labs were added which didn't do core-ubiquitous computing research, still, the page was probably one of the central point of reference for a large number of people including researchers and students.

I urge you to reconsider the deletion of the page.

Thank you

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Stuartyeates (talk), who proposed it, and may wish to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion, because a "linkfarm" like this is not in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on external links: "it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic." JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Asian Sun Taekwondo

Like the topic McDonald Wikipedia allows topics on organizations and the contribution they have -Rvancopp (talk) 13:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Also note that the presence or absence of Article X cannot justify the presence or absence of Article Y. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Joyson Noel/Chohan family murders

Prospective article! Please bring back the talk page as well. Joyson Noel Holla at me! 13:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done GB fan 13:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Journal of Foreign Relations

The process by which I am trying to create an entry for the Journal of Foreign Relations is very confusing. I manage the Journal of Foreign Relations and with that said I have wish to have my entry for the Journal of Foreign Relations approved so people can find it on Wikipedia.

Any help resolving this would be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

John Lyman -Johnllyman (talk) 20:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Please read WP:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 22:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Not done - this page has not yet been deleted.. Part of the problem might be that since you work for them, you are not permitted to write an article about them, in part due to conflict of interest. The first version was deleted due to a copyright violation. The re-creation is currently blanked in order to try and resolve the copyright issues. It's now up for speedy deletion for the same reason, however, if you have submitted am WP:OTRS ticket to actually hand over the text of your website, it may appear soon. This does not, however, absolve you from WP:COI. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

OtherSpace

This was PROD for lack of notability and advertising in February of 2008. Since then, it has gained notability due to becoming the largest sci-fi MU*, has had several more mentions in the media, and its head developer has become notable since becoming content development director of a major MMORPG and a leader of the MUD community. As a member of the MUD task force, I'd appreciate a copy being sent to my user page to improve the article. Thanks. -Carduus (talk) 21:12, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 22:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Reread request, saw user wanted in userspace so moved to User:Carduus/OtherSpace. GB fan 22:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Brian Reichle (Brian Redban)

reasoning -96.244.155.168 (talk) 23:40, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done and will not be done Deleted as non-notable, and is clearly a non-notable individual. This is especially true based on the "references" ... none of them are classified as a reliable source. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Brian Reichle (Brian Redban)

Brian is a great comedian and podcast developer. -184.99.80.192 (talk) 08:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. See response just above. JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New New World Order

notion is well sourced and discussed ; I saw the article after a talk about the notion of a multilateral BRICS-dominated "post-New World Order" in Taiwan and then was unable to find it on Wikipedia although I had used it for an article I can but assume it was deleted by non-experts. Reliable third-party sources sure exist -GrandPhilliesFan (talk) 09:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

We have never had an article with that title (or New new world order or Post-New World Order any other variation I have tried. Any other suggestions for what the title might have been? JohnCD (talk) 10:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 Not done. Found it! It was New New World Order (politics), but as it was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New New World Order (politics) it cannot be restored here. You should approach user OwenX (talk), the admin who closed the AfD; then, if your concerns are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
excellent, thank you very much GrandPhilliesFan (talk) 10:33, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Priyanka_Jain

The article was deleted for copyright infringement. I do not believe that the article violated any copyright issues as the information was taken from a number of sources. However, instead of arguing over the deletion, I would just like a copy of the text and sources sent to me so that I can rewrite the article to remove any potential infringement. Thank you. -Jheditorials (talk) 13:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

 Done. Text emailed to you. Copying from several sources is still copying: please read Wikipedia:Copy-paste, and also WP:Close paraphrasing which explains that minor re-wording is not enough to avoid violating copyright. JohnCD (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. Jheditorials13:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Brian "Redban" Reichle

Brian Redban is the official co-host/producer of one of the most popular comedy-podcasts in the world, The Joe Rogan Experience, every episode has hundreds of thousands of views on a weekly basis and he also produces several other podcasts for his own podcast network "Deathsquad", there is no reason why this prominent podcast entrepreneur/comedian shouldn't be allowed to have his own Wikipedia page. In addition a simple Wikipedia search on "Redban" shows that he is referenced in five (5) different existing Wikipedia articles which shows that he is without a doubt a notable character who would benefit from a article of his own. -80.220.17.164 (talk) 14:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done, see response above. GB fan 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Treasury Section of Fine Arts

It does not duplicate Fine Arts article, as was claimed on the deletion notice -Motstravail (talk) 14:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done — There is no material to undelete in the article you mention. Our entry for Treasury Section of Fine Arts is simply a redirect, and that is the only edit. That page has no deleted revisions. You filed a previous undeletion request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 49#Treasure Section of Fine Arts. (Note that 'Treasury' was misspelled in the title as 'Treasure'). That request was denied because the deleted material is now in 'Overview' of Section of Painting and Sculpture. The topics are clearly the same, so there is no rationale for having a separate article. If you have more material you wish to add, you might consider doing so at Section of Painting and Sculpture. I did not check carefully who was the author of the text in the 'Overview' section but my guess is that it's your material. If you want the deleted material from Treasure Section of Fine Arts returned, please send me a Wikipedia email. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Bradford Billet

Approved usage of Biography -Pab 85 (talk) 17:18, 26 October 2011 (UTC)


Hello,

I recently created the Wikipedia page for Deputy Commissioner Bradford Billet at his request and utilized his official biography with his full permission, however, it was subsequently removed due to "copyright violations." These violations were due to the fact that the page itself is very similar to his biography listed on the NYC Mayor's Commission for the UN, Consular Corps and Protocol's (UNCCP) website. This is also taken from his official biography.

I understand the need for sources beyond a primary source alone and am actively working with Deputy Commissioner Billet to develop this page further so that it may contain information beyond just his biography; this additional information will include items and articles he has had published as well other aspects of his personal career (the intention is for this Wikipedia page to be about the individual Bradford Billet as opposed to his Deputy Commissioner position) or any other items he wishes to include.

It is my hope that the Bradford Billet page can and will be restored so that I can continue my attempts to raise the online profile of the UNCCP across several platforms and make our commission more accessible to the consulates, missions, and other diplomats based in NYC who utilize our office.

Thank you, Paul B.

Not done - this page is a copyright violation. You can recreate the article in your own words, be sure to include references from independent reliable sources. GB fan 17:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Template:Territories forming part of the Commonwealth

There is no duplication -Omdo (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg

This is an image taken by me from my book Swadhinta Sangram Ke Krantikari Sahitya Ka Itihas(Part-III) ISBN 8177831224(Set) page no 863. I am the author of this book and also hold the copyright of this book. This image is freely released by me in the public domain. You can see this image in wikimedia commons. This is a historical document which should not be deleted.Dr.'Krant'M.L.Verma (talk•Email) Krantmlverma (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Since File:Accused of Kakori Case 1925.jpg is on commons you can use it on Wikipedia too. Using WP:OTRS would be a good idea. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Angel Incorporated

A marketing representative hired by "Angel" has approached me for assistance in creating a neutral article. He says that the company had an old article was deleted, but unsure what the exact name was. If possible, can the article please be restored under user:Socialmedia2011/sandbox2? Thank you. -Phearson (talk) 00:29, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. I have tried but, unless he can provide a better guess at the article title, or the username of the original author, I'm afraid it will not be possible to trace it, and he will have to start from scratch. Tell him to read WP:COI, WP:BESTCOI, WP:PROMO, WP:BFAQ, WP:V, WP:N, WP:CORP, WP:YFA, WP:PEACOCK - it looks an intimidating reading list, but if he's going to do paid editing it will save him trouble in the end to understand all that in advance. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
The article may have been Angel.com. Peter E. James (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 Done - userfied to User:Socialmedia2011/Angel.com. As this title was salted - protected from creation - by Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk), you will need to get permission from him before restoring any version to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

cabro Aviation

reasoning -Alanatabz (talk) 08:17, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


basically raised in line with that of Highland aviation

so see no reason for cabro aviation to be deleted when its a scaled down version of highland aviation

Auto Italia South East

MY page Auto Italia South East was deleted, the reason stated was 'ambiguous advertising' which is ridiculous. The page consisted of a simple description and history of the well renowned artists' run space. Auto Italia has recently become a National Portfolio Organisation meaning that it is of national importance to arts and culture[1] [2]. Auto Italia is a not-for-profit organisation, any accusation of advertising is completely unfounded as Auto Italia offers no services for sale. It is very frustrating to have to mount a defense against such blatant vandalism.Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC) -Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:18, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

You posted this, then posted on the deleting admin's talkpage? Common sense says you talk to the deleting admin first...or at least do one at a time. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:28, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
  •  Done Restored and cleaned up as per discussion on my talkpage. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Leslie Kulesh

I have been working on a series of pages dealing with the work of emerging artists, many of whom may well not be house hold names none-the-less it does not mean that their pages are worthy of deletion. A quick google search of the name Leslie Kulesh will proves that she is an artist with a notable career having show with many well known spaces and artists. There are many artists on Wikipedia whose pages are extremely poor but only preserved due to their connection with a millionaire art collector. If wikipedia's cultural value system is only based on capital then the entire project is moribund. I believe that there should be some actual constructive discussion before pages can be deleted. Rather than just adding a deletion category. -Chaosandvoid (talk) 17:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done You might have a rather skewed view of the purpose of an encyclopedia. Have you read Wikipedia:ARTIST for more information on notability for artisans? This is most certainly not the place for emerging artists (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:37, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Bob Stubbs

I am not the original creator of the page for "Bob Stubbs" - they are no longer accessible or am I able to contact them.The "Bob Stubbs" wikipedia page has been under attack on a semi regular basis from other vandals since it's inception.The page is a continued information page that is linked to the "Social Distortion" page regarding former band members of that particular rock music band.The page is important and has been re-edited down for content twice before.Now someone has the entire page on Fast Track for deletion.I do not have access to a computer to stop this nor do I have anyone I know that can fix and/or edit the page to get it back to standard so it will be left alone.Please Help-any edits are ok as long as pertinent information remains and it is linked to the Social Distortion page on wikipedia. Thanks. Bob Stubbsreasoning -98.165.179.75 (talk) 05:14, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Brian Reichle (Redban)

Brian has done a lot for the comedy scene. He co-hosts a podcast with Joe Rogan which has over half a million listeners. He also is responsible for the Death Squad podcast series which is currently number 6 in the top 10 podcasts -87.112.83.249 (talk) 11:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

  • Not done and will not be done. For the final time, the article as written cannot be salvaged, whatsoever. There is a recommendation on the talkpage for this forum on how you might be able to proceed in creating an article (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:59, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

lizard (band)

reasoning -Wickedclown28 (talk) 23:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 23:51, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done - see WP:BAND for what a band need to have achieved before having a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:39, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Dr Eugene Novotney

I wrote this article because I saw that Dr Novotney was one of the few important instructors listed in the Humboldt State University faculty list, who didn't have his own article. The article I wrote was deleted because I did not (yet) include references. More importantly, it was deleted because the biography appears verbatim at http://www.unlockingclave.com/bio-eugene-novotney.html. Unlocking Clave.com is my website and I wrote the bio of Dr Novotney because I offer his ground-breaking Doctoral thesis "The 3:2 Relationship as the Foundation of Timelines in West African Musics" as a free PDF download. I could write another bio, but since I wrote the one I posted in Wikipedia, might that bio be sufficient? I fully intend to add references, which will be easy. I'm currently working on several Wikipedia at once, and I add material every few days. Perhaps this isn't the best method. I'm sorry, I don't want to break Wikipedia protocols. Please reconsider the deletion of this article -Dr clave (talk) 09:07, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

 Not done - we can't restore copyright material without a formal copyright release - see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure to follow. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Antonino Arconte

The figure of Antonino Arconte and interesting for an encyclopedia, because it represents for over twenty years, the true story of Nucleus G of Gladio Organization, Stay Behind in Italy and other occidental nation. The accompanying notes are parliamentary questions of the Italian Government, unfortunately in Italian, which everyone can translate to understand the truth of important historical events. For this reason the page encyclopedic already exists in wikipedia, the free encyclopedia in Italian language and was from me only translated into English. Links to official sites, are reduced to the essentials and show that when it is written in the brief artist portrait-biography it's documented with official acts of the Italian Government and parliament. I believe that the reason for the cancellation is unfounded and caused by failure to read texts enclosed in the original language. In addition to the fact that we do not know this history very important for the understanding of the cold war, and it is precisely for this reason, there are the voices of the encyclopaedias like Wikipedia. Let me know thanks Nino -Aarconte (talk) 16:08, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Eyeshine (band)

All links are absolutely valid, and the articles are extremely informative. -98.148.208.105 (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Not done You need to argue your case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyeshine (band) (2nd nomination) as the article is not yet deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:52, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1988.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 2. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1991.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 3. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (bump) -- Trevj (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

File:RISC OS Icon Bar 1999.PNG

Previously used in Icon bar#RISC OS 4. -Trevj (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (bump) -- Trevj (talk) 08:11, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Done Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:25, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Thank you -- Trevj (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
  1. ^ http://press.artscouncil.org.uk/Press-Releases/Arts-Council-England-announces-funding-decisions-and-new-National-portfolio-of-arts-organisations-4af.aspx
  2. ^ http://www.a-n.co.uk/knowledge_bank/article/1191180/1191261
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_53&oldid=1139826991"