Wikipedia:Peer review/Wei Yan/archive2

Wei Yan[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because the page has major improvements as per the previous peer reviews requirements which noticed the article's problems, including:

reducing some WP:Oversection problem which not solved for more than a decade
improving the pupular culture legacy section with each of quotation reference by @KeeperOfThePeace:
summarized the "analysis" section.
reference now has page numbers or at least the link to the page in each books/journals
inline citations improvements, including the quotation from secondary sources such as modern time academic figures & universities researches which gave commentary to the primary sources by @Z1720:

i humbly asking for senior member of wikipedia 3kingdom project too for this review @Benjitheijneb:, @Jftsang: @Underbar dk:

Asking fellow peer reviewer volunteers too @Vice regent: @Goldsztajn:

Thanks before, hopefully this page can be improved to GA. Ahendra (talk) 04:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ahendra, I'm happy to leave some comments but see that you haven't edited in a while—are you still working on this? Please ping me if you get a chance to respond. Best – Aza24 (talk) 20:29, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahendra For some reason, I've only just received this ping. As with Aza24, let me know if you are still interested in a response (although I have to admit this is far from an area of strength for me!). Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]