Wikipedia:Peer review/WXKW/archive1

WXKW[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review due to its format, which seems more like a story or recounting rather than an actual encyclopaedic article. I did not write it.

Thanks, Crystal Walrein (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The history text is a copyvio from http://www.theboss97.com/history.html so I have now removed it. *As for the rest of the article, it has no references whatsoever and is as you have stated, written almost as a blog.
Words like "oldies" need to be linked or explained.
"Enginneer " typo
The article needs an expert in the field to completely rewrite it from scratch, I would suggest.
I've tagged it as unref'ed and as a story.

The Rambling Man (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]