Wikipedia:Peer review/Virgo (album)/archive1

Virgo (album)[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

Hello, a peer review would be much appreciated, as I intend for this article to reach GA status despite the small amount of sources around its subject.

Thank you! Bleff (talk) 04:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not too familiar with the wikiproject of music but I found somethings that might be addressed to make it GA.Tintor2 (talk) 16:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avoid unsourced sentences like the final one from "Background and production"
Same with the first paragraph of "release and reception"
Why is "release history" unsourced? Is it not necessary according the project's manual?

Also I started my own peer review here. I would appreciate feedback.

Comments by Jennica[edit]

I suppose the "References" section could be renamed and maybe even downgraded to a Bold header as "Works cited".--Jennica✿^{talk / contribs} 02:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Dig deeper[edit]

In the lead, the 3 comments: "made no effort to promote the album..." "Virgo is now recognized as an essential release among house enthusiasts" and "considered by manyas the greatest album of its genre." are unusual statements and should each be supported with references. See MOS:LEAD for more info. I'm not a music expert, but overall I'd say it looks very good. Well done.Dig Deeper (talk) 20:08, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]