Wikipedia:Peer review/Twice/archive1

Twice[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because...

I am planning to promote this to a good or featured article...

Thanks, RMXY (talk • contribs) 10:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe certain sections require updates and expansion. Specifically, the Artistry section should encompass their new direction, sound, and image, as it currently doesn't cover everything. It also doesn't address their early music comprehensively. The same applies to the Impact section. Lililolol (talk) 18:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Z1720[edit]

Comments after a quick skim:

"Los Angeles, Ca." Do not use short forms like this. Instead, use the whole state's name.
Per MOS:ALLCAPS, in the sources have titles in sentence case and not all caps (Twice will often be in all caps in titles of sources)
Per WP:FORBESCON, Forbes contributors are not reliable sources and need to be replaced or removed.

I think this is ready for GAN. Z1720 (talk) 19:26, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]