Wikipedia:Peer review/Turkish Airlines fleet/archive1

Turkish Airlines fleet[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I have GA and maybe FA ambitions for this. I don't know if the grammar or layout is good. I'd appreciate any comments.

Cheers. — ~Styyx^Talk? 20:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Z1720[edit]

Some comments after a quick skim:

I would move fleet development before the current fleet section
Check all the websites to see if there's an author listed. If so, include their name in the reference.

Other than that, I think this is ready for a GAN, where issues can be resolved there. If you are thinking of a FAC run, I suggest reviewing other FACs now: this will build goodwill among the FAC community, so your article will get reviewed, and will help acquaint you with the FA criteria. Z1720 (talk) 00:12, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Z1720! I'm not super sure about the order change. This article "replaced" this section in the main article, which now looks like this. There are many people coming from Turkish Airlines just to see the current fleet, and putting 45000 bytes of text before that doesn't seem like a good idea to me. On the second point, I've done all references manually (I had this sitting as a draft for 4 months, it was in my sandbox even before that, so I had plenty of time to do that stuff), and I thought that there wasn't to add. Turkish media rarely cites an author. Done some checks and yes, most of them don't have an author: but turns out I missed 4. ~Styyx^Talk? 22:31, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggested flipping the sections because it would put the article in chronological order, where the current fleet would be after the history and various aircrafts that exist. Wikipedia articles typically place the history section first (after the lede). Z1720 (talk) 23:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]