Wikipedia:Peer review/Trogidae/archive1
Trogidae[edit]
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because we're working on getting this article up to snuff and we'd like some input on how we're doing.
Thanks, ABrundage, Texas A&M University (talk) 02:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Ruhrfisch comments:
- It is always useful to have a model article to work on and follow as a guide for organization and ideas on how to discuss the topic. Chrysiridia rhipheus is a recent Good Article and seems like a decent model for this one.
- The lead should list the article name first (Trogidae) and hide beetles after, or else move the article to Hide beetles. This should be made as a redirect if the article is not moved.
- Be consitent - is it "hide beetles" (text) or "Hide beetles" (infobox)?
- Make sure the lead summarizes the whole article per WP:LEAD. For example, the Lead mentions three genera, but the article lists five.
- The lists of genera and species could be split off into a subarticle: List of Trogidae or perhaps List of Hide beetles
- Since Trogidae refers to hundreds of species, shouldn't it be treated as a plural? So It is believed that Trogidae hails from Australia. should be It is believed that Trogidae hail from Australia.
- The next sentence here reads like original research: Although migration to other parts of the world is not clearly outlined, it could be assumed that they first traveled with goods and cargo on ships. See WP:NOR
- The article is seriously under-referenced in that there are no inline citations - I see the refs at the end, but just like a scientific paper, there should be footnotes. At a minimum, each paragraph should have a ref, as should all direct quotes, all statisctics, and any extraordinary claims. Please see WP:CITE and WP:V.
- The article is also under-linked and needs many more wikilinks.
- Per the MOS, units should be in both metric and English units (not just mm). Try using {{convert}}.