Wikipedia:Peer review/Timeline of the 1992 Atlantic hurricane season/archive1

Timeline of the 1992 Atlantic hurricane season[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for January 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to receive a broad outlook on how to improve the article to featured list standard, I'm not much of a hurricane fan, but began work on this article. So fire away! Thanks. Sunderland06 (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from RockManQ:

The 1992 Atlantic hurricane season was a below-average Atlantic hurricane season that produced six named tropical cyclones.

Redundancy; you use Atlantic hurricane season twice. Also, what defines a average season. Having read that, I have no idea. Done - Removed redundancy, and defined 10 storms as average.

The season officially started on June 1, 2007, and finished on November 30, although Subtropical Storm One formed outside the official timescale, on April 21.

It's kind of choppy; I suggest you break it up or find a better way to transition from one part to the next. Done - Removed a few commas, and added a semi colon, helps break it up a bit better.

Subtropical Storm One was the first recorded subtropical cyclone to form in April since tracking began in 1968.

I don't like the word tracking here, it doesn't really give us any understanding. Basically, since who began tracking what? Done - Changed.

Of the four hurricanes, Hurricane Andrew was the most intense, reaching Category 5 status.

Link Category 5 to the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane scale Done - Linked.

Overall, it's very short. The lead should be at least 3 paragraphs if possible. Did anymore storms make landfall during the 1992 season? If so it would be a good idea to mention them.

This was all I found with it. You have a good start, it just needs to be expanded some more. VX!^~~~ 21:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]