I've been working on this article for a bit of time and I'd like to see how far away it is from a shot at FAC. It's shorter than other FAs I've seen, but I still believe in the article. Thanks, Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 06:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to be comprehensive and well-formatted, except the reference section. I see at least one unformatted reference [1], some other references may need additional information, such as author, publisher, or date. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:44, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed the ref you mention (which is a bit weird because there are two different versions), and I'll probably do a sweep of them tonight, just to make sure that everything is top notch. Thanks for contributing to the peer review, by the way! Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 11:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Piotrus, I have finished my reference sweep. Let me know what else, if anything, needs fixing.. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 18:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me, I am unfortunately not very familiar with music topics. I wonder if ref 28 (list of youtube videos) shouldn't be moved to notes. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:27, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a good idea. I will try to find a proper source that mentions the visualisers, but for now, I'll convert them to notes. Thatoneweirdwikier | Say hi 05:21, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have finished my reference sweep. Let me know what else, if anything, needs fixing.. Thatone