Wikipedia:Peer review/Taj Mahal/archive3

Taj Mahal[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because we are thinking to prep it up for FAC and make it the best. With about 4 million annual readership, this is a Top Vital level article.

Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:38, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

If FAC is the ultimate goal, I would suggest significant attention on the references. Citations should be complete and consistently formatted, and at the moment we're a ways off from that. You'll also want to check that references are of high quality, and that they represent a reasonable survey of the literature on the topic. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:02, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald: I'll happily fix all your references etc. if I can convert them all to my preferred format (see Bengal famine of 1943 for example). We'd have to put a notice ("Proposed change to references format") on the article's talk page and wait a while first too, though. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 06:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DONE. I had to delete a couple dead references and some copyvio. It isn't 100% perfect (I have real life things to do), but it's 97 or 98% better. I think you are still weeks of hard work away from FA. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 01:17, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]