Wikipedia:Peer review/S&M (song)/archive1

S&M (song)[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because… I want to know the specifics now of what to do on the S&M article in order to make it GA standard for nomination. What I mean by this is that instead of being told "the reference section needs work and references are un-formatted", I would like to know what exactly needs work in the reference section (Are all refs wrong? Part wrong? Formatted wrong? Missed something out in the ref.? etc.). I've found the 2 GA reviews to be a bit vague, so I'm hoping I will get actual help here. This is my first article I am trying to make GA, so I need to know everything about how to make it GA.

Thanks, calvin999 (talk) 16:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of commenting here and making you more confused, I would wholly revamp and copy-edit the article, so that it will be much much easier for you to understand. Follow the reference modifications I'm doing and the prose changes too. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]