Wikipedia:Peer review/Poppy Meadow/archive1
Poppy Meadow[edit]
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
Thanks, MayhemMario 20:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Per my nomination at FAC, the article may have plagiarism and mis-attribution, per an editors comments at FAC, and this is how I can get it up to FA level. Also a general sort out of the Reception section. This was brought up later here. Thanks, MayhemMario 20:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- Is the plagiarism and mis-attribution cleared up? Not much use in a review until it is, particularly the former. Allens (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it is! I did some edits, checked the sources, etc. MayhemMario 15:56, 29 January 2012 (UTC)