Wikipedia:Peer review/PJ Harvey/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PJ Harvey[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because PJ Harvey is a charting English artist who's article has been rated as one of high quality. The article's citations are in check as well. I think PJ Harvey would make a splendid featured article and I was surprised to see that it had not been yet. I plan nominate the article to be featured if the peer review shows that it's high enough quality.

Thanks, Mrmoustache14 (talk) 04:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments:

I have been looking at citations and references. There are a number of issues:-

  • Citations apparently lacking in the text. This may be partly due to misplacement of citations, but you should check the following:-
  • Automatic Dlamini: Last part of first paragraph, whole of second paragraph
  • Stories from the City etc: Last sentence of first paragraph
  • White Chalk and Let England Shake: Final phrases of first paragraph
  • Reference formats and related issues: I have only checked out the first of the three columns, and it is likely that the issues identified here will recur in the following two columns:
  • check link Ref 7 (links to a blank page)
  • Ref 9 also links to a blank page. Also, it needs to be formatted
  • Ref 11: page numberneeds to be clarified
  • Ref 12: Why is http://www.jphuntley.co.uk/pjh/FullPages/fullbiography.htm a reliable source?
  • Ref 13: Where is the transcription referred to available? Has it been published?
  • Ref 15: Why is this source reliable?
  • Ref 16: Why is this source reliable: The page looks distinctly amateurish
  • Ref 18: I'm not clear as to the physical form of this source.
  • Ref 20: Same query as 13
  • Ref 22: Format problems (bolded date)
  • Ref 28: Links to "page not found"
  • Ref 29: Format problems (open-ended quote marks; if this is a book title it should be italicised, ISBN missing)
  • Ref 30: Magazine title should be italicised
  • Ref 36: To what do the page numbers refer in this ref?

I have not been abe to check out the prose, but you need to work on the above. Brianboulton (talk) 16:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]