Wikipedia:Peer review/Monopsony/archive1
Monopsony[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because its my first review and edit of an article. Interested (if your familiar with the topic) for any suggestions for contents missed, or any improvements to format, style etc.
Thanks, Relox1 (talk) 05:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
CaptainEek[edit]
Howdy hello @Relox1:! Economics is not my specialty, but hopefully I can help a bit. Once you've taken this peer review into account, you might try taking this article to WP:GA status!
- A table in the lead is not standard. I would move the table into the body at a relevant point.
- Not everything has a source. Every paragraph should have a citation to reliable source that supports it.
- I would try to provide a section about real world examples and breaking them down a bit.
CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)