Wikipedia:Peer review/Mediocre (album)/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mediocre (album)[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've worked on it a little, and I feel it's almost ready to be upgraded to B-class status.

Thanks, – Obento Musubi (CGS) 09:34, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ruhrfisch comments: Very briefly, here are some suggestions for improvement.

  • A model article is useful for ideas and examples to follow - there are a large number of Featured Articles on music albums at Wikipedia:Featured_articles#Music that may be useful.
  • Okay, I will take a look. Thanks. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 01:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Amazon.com is not a valid source for critical reviews - anyone can review there.
  • "No Vuelvo Más" is currently on both the "Los 40 Principales" and "México Top 100" charts, so the statistics may change every week. needs a ref or two, and articles should avoid words like "currently" (this may change tomorrow or next week). Use as of October 2008 or something similar.
  • Green tickY Removed. It doesn't seem like it's going to get any higher anyway. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 01:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think the Critical reception section abuses block quotes - see a model FA article on how to do this better.
  • Green tickY Fixed. I took only the most important parts of each quote and pieced them together. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 01:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Missing sections / information - needs Recording and production, Style, other information, probably others, see a model article or two again
  • Green tickY I'm not sure there's much information regarding recording and production. I'll start working on the style section. Thanks! – Obento Musubi (CGS) 01:06, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY I have just added a musical style section. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 01:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Green tickY I have also added a personnel section. – Obento Musubi (CGS) 06:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 03:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]