Wikipedia:Peer review/List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2002/archive1

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Albums of 2002

• A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I want to receive feedback to complete this list in the most accurate way possible

Thanks, Jaespinoza (talk) 21:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments from NapHit (talk · contribs)

• "universe of merchants" bit POV I would suggest a better word than universe. DONE!
• You have eight references in a row in the last paragraph in the lead, which is not necssary remove some or move them about, to say after the relevant artist. DONE!
• An image of one of the artists would be good. DONE!
• The weeks at number one table seems a bit weird; firstly the numbers in the weeks at number one column should be centrally aligned, and I would move this column to the end. Also any reason for the current order?. DONE: I got rid of that table.
• You can remove .com from the refernces they are not Billboard on its own for example would suffice. Answer: Should I removed the ".com" from all refs?. Jaespinoza (talk) 05:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Yeh you should NapHit (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC) FIXED! Jaespinoza (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2008 (UTC)