Wikipedia:Peer review/John Robert Boyle/archive1

John Robert Boyle

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm thinking of taking this to FAC, though it's a good deal shorter than anything I've nominated there before. I'd hoped that I might be able to dig up more about his career as a jurist, but the legal literature databases don't turn anything up about him, so I think we may be left with what's seeped into the political coverage. I'd welcome thoughts on any aspect of the article, and there's nothing in particular that I'm wondering about (though if you notice any obvious gaps in coverage, I can try to dig up sources). Thanks, Steve Smith (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Comments

• I think a footnote explaining (or at least noting) the vast difference in dates of birth would be useful.
• "he came west " not sure what that really means, I would suggest he moved to the west of the country rather than "came west"?
• "1888 and 1889" how does one complete high school twice?
• Lake Louise is a dab link.
• "Table (parliamentary procedure)" is linked, but is a kind of dab because it says the same phrase has two opposite meanings.
• You link Canadian dollar the second time round.
• Just a question really, you have Quebec with no accents but Québécois with two. Is that conventional?
• Not sure you need to link "pipeline" really.
• "1921|1921 election]], Boyle " something odd going on here...
• "In the [[Alberta general election," ditto.
• Do the colours in the table mean anything?
• Perhaps separate the last part of the table out since there are seemingly no political affiliations. Currently with the empty cells it looks quite odd.
• I would typically expect the notes to be referenced.
• "Law, John M.." spare dot.
• 1892-1940 - en-dash needed.

The Rambling Man (talk) 12:43, 11 April 2012 (UTC)