Wikipedia:Peer review/Gila Monster/archive1

Gila Monster[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for September 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I need to check for flow, tense and grammatical errors.

Thanks, StevePrutz (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the automated peer review stuff. Unfortunately, it's not particularly detailed. bibliomaniac 1 5 00:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the semi-automated peer review (SAPR) because it should not be included here for the following reasons: 1) when the SAPR is included here, this peer review request does not show up at WP:PR for others to see it and make comments; 2) this saves space at WP:PR; and 3) this follows the directions above, i.e. "Please do not ... paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead." I forgot to run the SAPRs yesterday, but just ran it and the bot will link it in about 8.5 hours. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 01:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then. Not that it offered much help anyway. bibliomaniac 1 5 04:13, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Gonzo fan2007

Resolved comments from Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs)

{{{2}}}

Nice work, I can't find anything else. I also like how you changed slowness to sluggish, nice one. I really enjoyed this article, since I'm from one of the Gila monster's homes! :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 00:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]