Wikipedia:Peer review/Codex Gigas/archive1

Codex Gigas[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to work on getting this to good article status. The only problem being that I've never done this before! So I'd like some pointers from a few other people whilst I'm working on it.

Thanks, and I hope that's appropriate! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 19:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Jappalang

http://www.thepraguepost.com/articles/2007/09/12/satanic-inspiration.php, http://www.praguepost.com/P03/2005/Art/1020/tempo1.php, and http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gYzqgdMGrERUXOgPR8RnQwrK1LTA do not lead anywhere; please fix them.

Most of the article is not cited to sources. This violates the policy of verifiability. Please cite the information to the relevant reliable source. Without doing so, there is no point in going ahead with a peer review, as no one else would be certain if the information has a source. This violation will also cause the article to be instantly failed at WP:GAN. Jappalang (talk) 02:27, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]