Wikipedia:Peer review/Bruce Chatwin/archive1

Bruce Chatwin[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I am interested in nominating it for Featured Article status and would like feedback on improving the article before nominating it.

Thanks, Notachatterbox (talk) 23:23, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay Notachatterbox. I only managed to get two FAs so far but I managed to get some knowledge that might help you before nominating this article.

First of all, avoid small paragraphs like Themes' first one. Merge them with others or try to expand them.
All the references need wikilinks. See for example my recent FA, Tidus, that has links in all of its references regardless of repeating sites.
Avoid redlinks.

Other than that, I can't find more notable issues. I also have my own current peer review, Wikipedia:Peer review/D.Gray-man/archive1, so I wonder if you could provide commentary there. Good luck with the article.Tintor2 (talk) 15:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing! I appreciate it your comments - they're helpful! Notachatterbox (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]