Wikipedia:Peer review/Ashford v Thornton/archive1

Ashford v Thornton[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… I've recently expanded this from a stub and am considering whether to nominate it for FA. This is the famous "trial by battle" case, by the way. Speaking as a lawyer, I'd like to see trial by battle brought back, but that's just me.

Thanks, Wehwalt (talk) 22:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read it with interest. ~~Two small points: the "boen" for "been" in a Lord Ellenborough quote should be corrected or marked with sic; and could you add when the last positive record of trial by battle was?~~ Ucucha 23:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it is "been". I cut and pasted from the google books plain text and an error carried over. I'll add the other one.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix and addition. Ucucha 23:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]