Wikipedia:Peer review/Alma Mater (New York sculpture)/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm looking to get it to GA status.

Thanks, Normsupon (talk) 23:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend moving "Design" either below or after History - my recommendation would be above. The "Reception" section reads like it would read better at the end of the article.
What is the modern reception of this sculpture?
Commas aren't necessary in "month-year" dates, like "September 1903". They are, however, necessary after "month-day-year" dates like "March 4, 1901". See MOS:DATEFORMAT.
Besides the 1970 bombing and 1978 refurbishment, are the only major events in the statue's later history composed of protests and pranks?

These are just a few things I noticed on a quick read. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:22, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]