Wikipedia:Peer review/2009 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2009 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters[edit]

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… it has been expanded by 5x to meet the requirements for a Did You Know Entry. I would like feedback on the quality of the prose, accessability etc.

Thanks, 03md 12:35, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brianboulton comments

  • Lead
    • The first paragraph needs to say that this was a tournament for male players.
    • The dates of the tournament would be better given in the first sentence, which might read: "The 2009 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters, a tennis tournament for male players, was played from April 11 through April 19, 2009, on outdoor clay courts.
    • "Tennis" does not need linking
    • "It was the 103rd edition of the event known that year as the Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters..." This may be a bit confusing to people who are not well informed about tournament sponsorship. It may be advisable to have a more explanatory sentence, such as: "It was the 103rd edition of the annual Monte-Carlo Masters tournament, which since [year] has been sponsored by Rolex".
    • "Except Andy Roddick, all of the top ranked tennis players participated." Should read: "Except for Andy Roddick, all the top ranked male tennis players participated."
    • It would be neater, and less jargony, to say "World No. 2" rather than "World #2" which doesn't look good in prose.
    • "Meanwhile" means "while this was happening". Nadal wasn't winning the tournament while Federer was accepting a wild card, so the word should be deleted.
    • You need to clarify that by "a record fifth straight title" you mean a record fifth consecutive victory in this tournament.
    • "5" should be written as "five" per WP:MOS
    • In the same sentence, "masters" should be "Masters"
    • "The 2009 Monte Carlo Masters tournament was the only one of the nine "Masters 1000" events that year that did not have a mandatory player commitment" You can't talk about 2009 in the past tense – we're only in May. Try: "The 2009 Monte Carlo Masters is the only one of the nine "Masters 1000" events scheduled for that year without a mandatory player commitment"
    • "In 2007 the ATP had decided to make participation in the eight newly rebranded "Masters 1000" compulsory" Clarification needed – compulsory for whom?
    • Ref [3] covers the lawsuit, but what is the source for the information in the last part of the final lead sentence?
  • History
    • The word "beginning" is redundant
    • (Tournament details): You have "claycourt" as one word here, yet it was two words in the lead. Consistency required.
  • Summary – singles
    • You say the top 8 players in the world competed; earlier you said that Roddick didn't. And 8 should be eight.
    • "From the other seeded players..." should be "Of the other..." etc. And Stepanek's number should be given.
    • Not everyone will know what you mean by "qualifier". Perhaps a footnote could explain that a qualifier is someone not automatically qualified for the tournament by their ranking position, who gains entry through success in a qualifying competition.
    • "The seeds began to fall..." Some had fallen in the first round
    • Clarify you mean that Nadal has been the most successful player of the Open era in this tournament"
  • Summary – doubles
    • "The top eight doubles pairs..." Should be "The top-ranked eight..."
    • "also" is redundant after "Djokovic"
    • Rather than redlink, you should explain what a "champions tiebreak" is.
  • Citations: There is very little citation in the tournament description sections, none at all for the doubles. It needs to be made clear where this information is coming from.
  • Reference [1] needs formatting. It's a bare url at present.

I hope you find these comments useful. I can't watch all my peer reviews, so if you need me to look again, please ping my talkpage. Brianboulton (talk) 21:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]