Wikipedia:Peer review/2006 World Monuments Watch List of Most Endangered Sites/archive1

2006 World Monuments Watch List of Most Endangered Sites[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review to allow for the greater representation of conservation- and cultural heritage-related lists.

Thanks, Joey80 (talk) 04:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flagicons shouldn't be used per WP:MOSICON
Every field should be filled, even if its repeating because if the sorting feature is used in the table, rows that were once next to each other, no longer are.
Date ranges should have an En dash between them, instead of hyphens, per WP:MOSDASH
Each entry in the "Remarks" column should begin with a capital letter.
The "Notes" section should have a 2nd level heading (== ==) and be above the "References" section.
No blank lines between each of the individual notes
There isn't a column indicating the reasons for listing

I noted that the 2008 list was also up for peer review. Most of the comments provided there were copied to here, and are relevant here, as well. If you find these comments useful consider reviewing an article listed in the backlog (which is how I found this article). Niagara ^{Don't give up the ship} 03:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the comments. Joey80 (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]