Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Pauline Kael/1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. Consensus that there is a severe lack of referencing. Adabow (talk) 22:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Largely unreferenced, therefore failing rule 2b. ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 09:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, this article failed GAN in Dec 2006, and passed in July 2007. Chris857 (talk) 01:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delist I think "largely unreferenced" is an exaggeration, but there are some quotations and facts that need reference and some mild POV language to clean up. The biggest problem seems to me to be unattributed opinions like "The originality of her opinions, as well as the forceful way in which she expressed them, won her ardent supporters as well as angry critics". On a smaller note, the lead doesn't do a very good job of summarizing the article, and contains information not found in the body. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:53, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist As per Khazar's comments above. Large parts are unreferenced also. ★★Retro Lord ★★ 18:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]