Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Klaas-Jan Huntelaar/1

Klaas-Jan Huntelaar[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted, per discussion. Retrohead (talk) 18:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC).[reply]

This was listed as GA incredibly long ago, and the prose since is erratic, some sections are too short, others (as is usual in football player articles) way too detailed with useless infos (scored a goal here, scored one there). Plese leave your comments. Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Demote. Many issues, some listed below:

Some facts lack citations (against BLP policy).
One ref isn't defined.
Many dead links
"Schalc" section has too many short paragraphs
"Ajax" section is too detailed
Shouldn't his birth be put at the beginning of the article?

I will vote keep if the comments are addressed. Thanks,--Tomandjerry211 (alt)(talk) 16:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Demote - I certainly can't fix it by myself, to replace those dead Dutch refs and fill in two years of NOTHING in the Schalke section. Ajax section was fine, I just split it up. '''tAD''' (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]