Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Joker (comics)/1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page

Result: Quick-fail endorsed. PeterSymonds | talk 21:05, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many things to be cited. David Pro (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question. David, I'm afraid I don't understand why you brought this to GAR. The article was quick-failed by VanTucky over a month ago due to cleanup tags. Your comment leads me to believe that you don't think the article is GA standards. So what's up? Majoreditor (talk) 05:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This editor would appear to be relatively new to GA, and seems to be finding his way through the various labyrinthine processes. I agree that this is probably a misplaced, though good-faith, nomination, and I've left an explanation on his talk page. EyeSerene^TALK 12:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support quick-fail. Once cleaned up, the article can be nominated again. David Pro (talk) 19:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]