Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gravemind/1
Gravemind[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
Article needs a bit update. There are unsourced claim, particularly the appearances section. Additionally the reception section is extremely weak, with a trivial mentions and primary sources used in there. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 11:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delist The article mostly uses unreliable sources in its reception, and doesn't live up to GA criteria. I maintain this should have been a merge discussion instead and the Gravemind fails GNG. I did find one decent source which I added to the list of characters, but I believe the standalone article is a complete lost cause and needs to be merged or simply redirected. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 13:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- I wouldn't unless im so sure its not notable, maybe it will happen just like Balthier. About to nominate The Master (Fallout) for afd later thou since that article is what im sure isnt notable. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 14:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Or just nominate it for merge to Fallout (video game) as that is already a viable WP:ATD. No particular need for a deletion discussion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:57, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- I wouldn't unless im so sure its not notable, maybe it will happen just like Balthier. About to nominate The Master (Fallout) for afd later thou since that article is what im sure isnt notable. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 14:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.