Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Alasdair Cochrane/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alasdair Cochran[edit]

A new book by Cochrane, Sentientist Politics, was released in 2018 but never passed GA and a removal nomination was never made despite it certainly belongs as part of the topic thus failing 1.d. Pinging original nominator @J Milburn:.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 04:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Remove: Looks as though he's got another, Should Animals Have Political Rights?, that hasn't even been started. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • The article on Sentientist Politics is basically ready for GA status (as the original reviewer said), but I appreciate that it hasn't been promoted. I assumed Should Animals (which is a shorter book) probably wouldn't be notable, but I see there have been a couple of reviews, so you're right that it should probably be a part of this topic. I've no objection to the removal. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • If you think Sentientist Politics is ready to be a GA, then it would be great if you wanted to nominate it and shepherd it through GAN! We're not looking to demote a topic if someone is actively working on saving it. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove: Despite being close to GA, per nominator, it is not GA. On top of that, his latest book doesn't have an article nor is near to being promoted to GA. Unless the nominator decides to start to create and improve an article for the latter book, this will be my vote. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 13:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove: As per above. Idiosincrático (talk) 03:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closing with consensus to demote. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 01:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]