Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Up All Night/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Up All Night[edit]

Contributor(s): Robin

I'm nominating this because it seems to meet the Good Topic criteria. Regards. Robin (talk) 22:43, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Robin (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks good except that One Thing (One Direction song) has a weird redlink in the lede that looks accidental and needs to be fixed.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why does Moments deserve its own article? Nergaal (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because it's a notable song. In addition to charting in 3 countries, it received work from reputable sources. Robin (talk) 19:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I don't really understand how is the song really notable. In my opinion, having a song charting at best at number 60 in a country like Australia is not what I would call notable. I wouldn't be surprised if other of the band's songs that were not singles had charted better than that. Nergaal (talk) 04:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
        • I agree with you Nergaal. However, there seems to be a precedent that if a song charts, it gets an article if a fan can be bothered creating one. WP:NSONGS was changed recently, so there may be a case for higher standards of notability in such articles now, especially in recent years where songs chart based on downloads as an album track. Adabow (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Complete topic. Adabow (talk) 05:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support All articles in the scope are GA, nice work! (talk) 06:40, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - good work. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic. - GamerPro64 19:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]