Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:World War II/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured portal candidate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the portal's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured portal candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The portal was not promoted 01:54, 31 March 2008.

Portal:World War II[edit]

Respectfully submitted for your consideration. Based on Portal:World War I. I will attempt to address any comments or suggestions in a timely fashion. Carom (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support on condition that the header "Topics" be tweaked so as to put the entrance of Italy in line with the others. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'm not entirely sure why that's transcluding the way it is - it doesn't look like that on the subpage, or on the page for {{World War II}}. I've poked around a bit, and can't seem to find a way to fix it. Carom (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Nevermind, I seem to have been able to fix it - hopefully I haven't broken anything in the process. Carom (talk) 00:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • I've tried to address this, let me know if you think it still needs some work. Carom (talk) 01:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry for late response. Need similiar work on Equipment section. Thanks, Shyam (T/C) 05:38, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Featured article: Either must have all of them as featured articles. Former ones won't do. Or, change the name as Selected article. As, there are many articles in Featured content section, you may broaden your featured articles list, followed by removing other then featured ones.
Done. Carom (talk) 13:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, You may add link for Hovhannes Bagramyan in Featured article. Better to keep bold only the article's link and unbold others, like Battle of the Bloody Ridge, Battle of Raiders Ridge, and Battle of the Ridge etc. Shyam (T/C) 09:55, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Carom (talk) 01:50, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Associated Wikimedia: Use search page for Wikibooks and Wikisource. - Shyam (T/C) 08:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Carom (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Witold Pilecki's featured article section contains fair-use images. Also, 10 images, biographies, articles, and equipments don't impress me. They are on the low side. OhanaUnitedTalk page 13:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't understand your first point. If Pilecki's article contains fair-use images, that's not a problem for the portal. They're not being used on portal sub-pages, as far as I can tell, and linking to an article that contains fair-use images is not, insofar as I am aware, problematic in any way. With regards to your second point, it's a fair comment, but it's one I'm not entirely sure I have time to remedy at the moment. If you think it's worth opposing over, you may as well oppose, as I can't promise that I will be able to address it in a timely fashion. Carom (talk) 16:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am talking about the portal's selected article, why would I want to talk about the article itself? OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:52, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm thoroughly confused - Witold Pilecki is not a selected article on this portal. I really don't understand what problem you are trying to describe. Carom (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Ah, I see. The subpages after 10 had been removed from rotation (notice how they aren't listed on the "More featured articles" page) - either I forgot to change the coding on the portal, or it was changed back at some point. At any rate, those subpages (including Pilecki) will no longer rotate into the portal. Carom (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. One thing, could the top of the page have the same portal index as other portals? Culture, Geography, etc. -Susanlesch (talk) 03:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the other featured military portals (e.g. Portal:War) use the military browsebar at the top, and the standard portal index at the bottom, so I've simply followed that convention. There was some discussion of this, I think...let me see if I can find a link. Carom (talk) 03:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the discussion I was thinking of, although it's perhaps not as germane as I had thought. Carom (talk) 03:27, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now I see that comes from featured military portals (possibly weird maybe, like an infinitely expanding list, but I see what you mean). Thank you for the link. -Susanlesch (talk) 05:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The red links in the "Topics' section are a result of transcluding {{World War II}} - it seems a little excessive to remove this useful and simple way of keeping this section up-to-date and consistent with other uses of the template simply for the sake of removing two red links. Carom (talk) 17:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Closed as no consensus by OhanaUnited. The community is divided between whether it should be promoted or needs more work, particularly satisfying Featured portal criteria 2 and 3.2. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_portal_candidates/Portal:World_War_II/archive1&oldid=1138147014"