Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Me109

Replace: Me109[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2014 at 10:43:20 (UTC)

Reason: Black levels need adjustement. Already done but has been reverted.
Articles this image appears in: Messerschmitt Bf 109
Previous nomination/s: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Me109
Nominator: (Hohum ^@)

Replace — (Hohum ^@) 10:43, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Replace with? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the revert list for the current image. (Hohum ^@) 15:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In any case, it should be called a Bf 109. Sca (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, that still has most of the same issues. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delist I'm just not seeing the technical quality that people saw when this was promoted in 2008. Then again, there are a lot of things that were promoted in 2008 across all of the featured processes that fall well short of the 2014 criteria and expectations. I'm not sure what to make of Dapi89's oppose in the original nomination, but I do feel that it is something that is worth taking into consideration as well. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 20:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. I'm with Sven. Minimum size and so on notwithstanding, I don't think there's really any way we should be featuring a photo of anything as large as a plane that's so small. J Milburn (talk) 22:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per J. Milburn. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delist as per 2008. I was a wise thing back then, and I agree with myself entirely. I hope if Sven Manguard reads the thread it will make sense to him. I'm glad he thinks the points I made back then are still worth considering. Dapi89 (talk) 23:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Dapi89: Oh, no, I understand what your argument from 2008 is. When I said I'm not sure what to make of it, I meant that I'm not sure if, assuming the image had no other problems, I would have opposed the image based on your argument. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 23:45, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - That is a shame. Deciding on image quality alone with little regard for what is shown is incomprehensible to me. Each to his own. Dapi89 (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]