Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Town Hall of Ridgefield, Connecticut

Town Hall of Ridgefield, Connecticut[edit]

Reason: because it is good quality, large, and is a unique compared to other pictures
Articles this image appears in: Ridgefield, Connecticut
Creator: Pepperpiggle

Support as nominator --*Pepper piggle*^*Sign!* 21:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Can barely see town hall, not very high quality, and lens glare. I don't think it is unique either. (Sorry if I sound critical, but that is my opinion.) Dog poster 22:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- The picture is clearly tilted. The giant flag is almost completely covering the building. The traffic light post and the street sign are also very distracting. The sky is completely over-exposed. Technically speaking, the quality is quite poor (just look at the red and blue color bleeding around the street lights). -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 06:44, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close for obvious reasons. MER-C 10:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but not speedy. To the nominator: try a different angle and framing under better lighting conditions, and if there's an encyclopedic purpose to the large flag please explain in the caption. You might like to try Wikipedia:Picture peer review for more feedback on your next attempt. Best wishes. Durova²⁸⁸ 18:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bluntly speaking, the image looks like a real estate ad in a poor quality. The green sign looks like "for sale"...-Caspian blue 19:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose - Per above. Gage (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose This is as much a photo of a sign for Main Street as it is for the unmarked and unclear town hall. Staxringold _talk^contribs 17:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per all of the above. Zulualpha (talk) 15:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Shoemaker's Holiday ^{Over 184 FCs served} 00:35, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]