Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Olivia Wilde

Olivia Wilde[edit]

Reason: Beautiful image, I noticed while I was looking around on Commons
Articles this image appears in: Olivia Wilde
Creator: Tao Ruspoli

Support as nominator ----Music26/11 13:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low EV with the face being obscured by hair and the eyes closed. --Leivick (talk) 04:19, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support - I believe it has EV just because it's currently the only image we have of the actress... but the hair and eye problems stop me from full support... :) Intothewoods29 (talk) 17:04, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose- The image is far too dark and this eliminates much of the detail. With this specific angle, it is a lot more difficult to identify this person. There is just nothing especially outstanding about this picture. -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 17:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree, it's dark but picture is also very sensual, what is a strong upside. Andrew₁₈ ^@ 21:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It was created as an artistic portrait rather than an illustration of the subject. Those aren't necessarily in opposition, but in this case, because of the angle, pose and lighting, detail and EV suffer for art's sake.--ragesoss (talk) 18:48, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the image is certainly interesting and visually appealing but it is not a particularly clear depiction of the actress nor is it a depiction of her doing what she is primarily known for (acting), the blur on the hand is also a bit distracting. Guest9999 (talk) 18:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above - encyclopedic value is suffering from the artsy lighting (which incidentally is a bit cliched) --Abdominator (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support an aesthetically appealing portrait with lots of detail. I don't think a photo of an actor needs to look like a medical illustration in order to have high EV. de Bivort 03:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this photo is totally unhelpful for me to know what she looks like. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, that is a great photo! Ecoleetage (talk) 19:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
fap fap fap --Piepie (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 08:10, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]