Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Mexican National Tag Team Championship/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Mexican National Tag Team Championship[edit]
Mexican National Tag Team Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Mexican National Tag Team Championship/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Mexican National Tag Team Championship/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it has the appropriate quality for a Featured List, it has actually been through an FLC before, but failed due to lack of participation sadly. I have kept this up to date, make sure to do format improvements as our FLs evolve. I have pushed 17 lists to FL status and each time I have learned a little. This latest list is the sum of everything I have learned and hopefully produced featured content. MPJ-DK (talk) 04:20, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:27, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments on the lead
|
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*OK, I think my only remaining query is around the structuring of the refs. If I look, for example, at Bestia Salvaje and Pierroth Jr.'s reign in 1990, the ref in the end column is to note aj in the "footnotes" section, which reads "Duncan & Will (2000) p. 396 "Pierroth Jr. & Bestia Salvaje 1990/05/26 Puebla". This is in turn sourced to ref 16 in the "references" section, "Duncan & Will 2000, p. 397." Firstly, the page numbers don't match, but secondly why is the info sourced to a footnote which is then sourced to a reference which says the same thing? Why not just source it straight to ref 16.......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Further comments
- Note d - should be "changed" not "changes"
- Note j needs a full stop
- Note k has a random capital I in Vitoria
- Note l has Guerreras spelt incorrectly
- Ref 35 has a missing [
- So does ref 41
- And ref 64
- Refs 60-63 start with "#ReferencesLucha" which doesn't seem right
- Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude - thank you for catching these, I have addressed them all. MPJ-DK (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- You hadn't quite fixed all the Observer links correctly, but I have sorted that for you and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there an alternative phrasing to avoid the SEAOFBLUE in "..is a national Mexican professional wrestling championship controlled.."?
- Foreign language terms, such as "Campeonato Nacional de Parejas", should be in a {{lang}} template, not just in plain italics, per MOS:LANG.
- "..Comisión de Box y Lucha Libre Mexico D.F. (Mexico City Boxing and Wrestling Commission).." Should have the foreign language term in a {{lang}} template, per above, and the English translation in plain text within the parentheses.
- "..by two man tag teams only." No need for "only", and it should be "two-man".
- "..was created in 1957 and promoted regularly until 2003, and intermittently until 2011.." Trim an "and": "..was created in 1957, promoted regularly until 2003, and intermittently until 2011.."
- Put "Empresa Mexicana de Lucha Libre" in a {{lang}} template.
- "..until February 19, 2020 where CMLL.." Two points: first, it should be "when", not "where". Second, you haven't defined CMLL; I assume it is "Comisión de Box y Lucha Libre Mexico D.F."?
- The first paragraph, which provides an overall summary, should mention the fact that the championship has been restarted.
- The lead states that EMLL controlled it until 1992, but the infobox says until 1991, when CMLL took over for a year.
- The Title history table needs row and column scopes as per MOS:ACCESS and detailed in MOS:DTT. This will require changes to {{Professional wrestling title history top}} and {{Professional wrestling title history middle}}.
- Manually adjust the sorting in the date column to make sure it corresponds with the No. column: at the moment, when sorted by date some of them appear in the wrong order.
- Using "N/A" for Unknown is misleading; the information is not "not applicable", it is unknown. Change it to just that: "Unknown".
- The Combined reigns and By wrestler tables also need row and column scopes as per MOS:ACCESS and detailed in MOS:DTT. These are much simpler cases.
That's all from me at the moment. Harrias talk 11:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
(Harrias based on the definition in the N/A article it can stand for not applicable,[1][2][3][4] not available[3][4] or no answer
, in this case "Not Available", so it seems to be within the definition of N/A. I am working on the remaining issues. MPJ-DK (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I have addressed the majority of the issues, only the "N/A" and the row/colscope issues in the template itself. I'll work on the template to get that introduced. MPJ-DK (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Harrias based on This comment from the template creator the scope parameters have been implemented. MPJ-DK (talk) 15:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support with two caveats. In Footnotes change "Stats" to "Statistics". Also, Wrestling Observer Newsletter in cite 53 does not use italics because it uses the "publisher" parameter rather than the "work" parameter. You did a great job with a championship that has many holes throughout its history, well done.LM2000 (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 03:19, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.